TSTP Solution File: PRO011+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : PRO011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 17:45:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 44 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 193 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 49 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 224 ( 75 ~; 85 |; 50 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 22 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 14 ( 12 usr; 5 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 70 ( 9 sgn 31 !; 14 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
! [X110] :
( occurrence_of(X110,tptp0)
=> ? [X111,X112] :
( leaf_occ(X112,X110)
& ( occurrence_of(X112,tptp1)
=> ~ ? [X113] :
( occurrence_of(X113,tptp2)
& subactivity_occurrence(X113,X110)
& min_precedes(X111,X113,tptp0) ) )
& ( occurrence_of(X112,tptp2)
=> ~ ? [X114] :
( occurrence_of(X114,tptp1)
& subactivity_occurrence(X114,X110)
& min_precedes(X111,X114,tptp0) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).
fof(sos_02,axiom,
! [X5,X6,X7] :
( ( occurrence_of(X5,X6)
& occurrence_of(X5,X7) )
=> X6 = X7 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sos_02) ).
fof(sos_35,axiom,
! [X106] :
( occurrence_of(X106,tptp0)
=> ? [X107,X108,X109] :
( occurrence_of(X107,tptp3)
& root_occ(X107,X106)
& occurrence_of(X108,tptp4)
& next_subocc(X107,X108,tptp0)
& ( occurrence_of(X109,tptp1)
| occurrence_of(X109,tptp2) )
& next_subocc(X108,X109,tptp0)
& leaf_occ(X109,X106) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sos_35) ).
fof(sos_34,axiom,
! [X103,X104] :
( leaf_occ(X103,X104)
<=> ? [X105] :
( occurrence_of(X104,X105)
& subactivity_occurrence(X103,X104)
& leaf(X103,X105) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sos_34) ).
fof(sos_21,axiom,
! [X57,X58] :
( leaf(X57,X58)
<=> ( ( root(X57,X58)
| ? [X59] : min_precedes(X59,X57,X58) )
& ~ ? [X60] : min_precedes(X57,X60,X58) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sos_21) ).
fof(sos_47,axiom,
tptp1 != tptp2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sos_47) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X110] :
( occurrence_of(X110,tptp0)
=> ? [X111,X112] :
( leaf_occ(X112,X110)
& ( occurrence_of(X112,tptp1)
=> ~ ? [X113] :
( occurrence_of(X113,tptp2)
& subactivity_occurrence(X113,X110)
& min_precedes(X111,X113,tptp0) ) )
& ( occurrence_of(X112,tptp2)
=> ~ ? [X114] :
( occurrence_of(X114,tptp1)
& subactivity_occurrence(X114,X110)
& min_precedes(X111,X114,tptp0) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X8,X9,X10] :
( ~ occurrence_of(X8,X9)
| ~ occurrence_of(X8,X10)
| X9 = X10 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_02])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X116,X117] :
( occurrence_of(esk19_0,tptp0)
& ( occurrence_of(X117,tptp2)
| occurrence_of(X117,tptp1)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( occurrence_of(esk21_2(X116,X117),tptp1)
| occurrence_of(X117,tptp1)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( subactivity_occurrence(esk21_2(X116,X117),esk19_0)
| occurrence_of(X117,tptp1)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( min_precedes(X116,esk21_2(X116,X117),tptp0)
| occurrence_of(X117,tptp1)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( occurrence_of(X117,tptp2)
| occurrence_of(esk20_2(X116,X117),tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( occurrence_of(esk21_2(X116,X117),tptp1)
| occurrence_of(esk20_2(X116,X117),tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( subactivity_occurrence(esk21_2(X116,X117),esk19_0)
| occurrence_of(esk20_2(X116,X117),tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( min_precedes(X116,esk21_2(X116,X117),tptp0)
| occurrence_of(esk20_2(X116,X117),tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( occurrence_of(X117,tptp2)
| subactivity_occurrence(esk20_2(X116,X117),esk19_0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( occurrence_of(esk21_2(X116,X117),tptp1)
| subactivity_occurrence(esk20_2(X116,X117),esk19_0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( subactivity_occurrence(esk21_2(X116,X117),esk19_0)
| subactivity_occurrence(esk20_2(X116,X117),esk19_0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( min_precedes(X116,esk21_2(X116,X117),tptp0)
| subactivity_occurrence(esk20_2(X116,X117),esk19_0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( occurrence_of(X117,tptp2)
| min_precedes(X116,esk20_2(X116,X117),tptp0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( occurrence_of(esk21_2(X116,X117),tptp1)
| min_precedes(X116,esk20_2(X116,X117),tptp0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( subactivity_occurrence(esk21_2(X116,X117),esk19_0)
| min_precedes(X116,esk20_2(X116,X117),tptp0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) )
& ( min_precedes(X116,esk21_2(X116,X117),tptp0)
| min_precedes(X116,esk20_2(X116,X117),tptp0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X117,esk19_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ epred2_0
<=> ! [X2] :
( occurrence_of(X2,tptp1)
| ~ leaf_occ(X2,esk19_0) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X110] :
( ( occurrence_of(esk16_1(X110),tptp3)
| ~ occurrence_of(X110,tptp0) )
& ( root_occ(esk16_1(X110),X110)
| ~ occurrence_of(X110,tptp0) )
& ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(X110),tptp4)
| ~ occurrence_of(X110,tptp0) )
& ( next_subocc(esk16_1(X110),esk17_1(X110),tptp0)
| ~ occurrence_of(X110,tptp0) )
& ( occurrence_of(esk18_1(X110),tptp1)
| occurrence_of(esk18_1(X110),tptp2)
| ~ occurrence_of(X110,tptp0) )
& ( next_subocc(esk17_1(X110),esk18_1(X110),tptp0)
| ~ occurrence_of(X110,tptp0) )
& ( leaf_occ(esk18_1(X110),X110)
| ~ occurrence_of(X110,tptp0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_35])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ occurrence_of(X3,X2)
| ~ occurrence_of(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
occurrence_of(esk19_0,tptp0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X106,X107,X106,X107,X109] :
( ( occurrence_of(X107,esk15_2(X106,X107))
| ~ leaf_occ(X106,X107) )
& ( subactivity_occurrence(X106,X107)
| ~ leaf_occ(X106,X107) )
& ( leaf(X106,esk15_2(X106,X107))
| ~ leaf_occ(X106,X107) )
& ( ~ occurrence_of(X107,X109)
| ~ subactivity_occurrence(X106,X107)
| ~ leaf(X106,X109)
| leaf_occ(X106,X107) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_34])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( epred2_0
| occurrence_of(X1,tptp1)
| ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk19_0) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( leaf_occ(esk18_1(X1),X1)
| ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ epred3_0
<=> ! [X2] :
( occurrence_of(X2,tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ(X2,esk19_0) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = tptp0
| ~ occurrence_of(esk19_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( occurrence_of(X2,esk15_2(X1,X2))
| ~ leaf_occ(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X61,X62,X64,X61,X62,X65] :
( ( root(X61,X62)
| min_precedes(esk6_2(X61,X62),X61,X62)
| ~ leaf(X61,X62) )
& ( ~ min_precedes(X61,X64,X62)
| ~ leaf(X61,X62) )
& ( ~ root(X61,X62)
| min_precedes(X61,esk7_2(X61,X62),X62)
| leaf(X61,X62) )
& ( ~ min_precedes(X65,X61,X62)
| min_precedes(X61,esk7_2(X61,X62),X62)
| leaf(X61,X62) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_21])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( epred2_0
| occurrence_of(esk18_1(esk19_0),tptp1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( epred3_0
| occurrence_of(X1,tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk19_0) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ epred4_0
<=> ! [X1] : ~ leaf(X1,tptp0) ),
introduced(definition) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( leaf(X1,esk15_2(X1,X2))
| ~ leaf_occ(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( esk15_2(X1,esk19_0) = tptp0
| ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk19_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ leaf(X1,X2)
| ~ min_precedes(X1,X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( occurrence_of(X1,tptp1)
| min_precedes(X2,esk21_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk19_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = tptp1
| epred2_0
| ~ occurrence_of(esk18_1(esk19_0),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( epred3_0
| occurrence_of(esk18_1(esk19_0),tptp2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_15]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
tptp1 != tptp2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sos_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( epred4_0
| ~ leaf(X1,tptp0) ),
inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( leaf(X1,tptp0)
| ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk19_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ~ epred4_0
| ~ epred2_0 ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_9]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( epred3_0
| epred2_0 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( epred4_0
| ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk19_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( epred3_0
| ~ epred4_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
epred4_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_15]),c_0_12])]) ).
fof(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ epred5_0
<=> ! [X1] : ~ leaf(X1,tptp0) ),
introduced(definition) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( min_precedes(X2,esk20_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
| occurrence_of(X1,tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk19_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
epred3_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ epred5_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_38]),c_0_16]),c_0_37]),c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
~ leaf(X1,tptp0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]),c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
~ leaf_occ(X1,esk19_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_15]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : PRO011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 00:55:26 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 44
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 28
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 16
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 25
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 22
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 14
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 18
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 49
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 102
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 102
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 269
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 39
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 219
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 38
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 557
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 495
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 15
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 545
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 171
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 13
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 138
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 272
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 1080
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 44
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6795
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4500
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 52
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 936
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 17
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 17
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12484
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.038 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3724 pages
% 0.23/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------