TSTP Solution File: PRO010+4 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : PRO010+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XxeHIudu9v true
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 13:10:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.59s 0.85s
% Output : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 4 unt; 14 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 57 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 199 ( 23 ~; 16 |; 15 &; 137 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 15 ( 15 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 15 ( 14 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 0 ^; 26 !; 12 ?; 38 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__3_type,type,
sk__3: $i > $i ).
thf(tptp2_type,type,
tptp2: $i ).
thf(next_subocc_type,type,
next_subocc: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(occurrence_of_type,type,
occurrence_of: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__4_type,type,
sk__4: $i ).
thf(tptp3_type,type,
tptp3: $i ).
thf(tptp4_type,type,
tptp4: $i ).
thf(min_precedes_type,type,
min_precedes: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(tptp0_type,type,
tptp0: $i ).
thf(leaf_occ_type,type,
leaf_occ: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(tptp1_type,type,
tptp1: $i ).
thf(root_occ_type,type,
root_occ: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__6_type,type,
sk__6: $i > $i ).
thf(sk__5_type,type,
sk__5: $i > $i ).
thf(goals,conjecture,
! [X105: $i] :
( ( occurrence_of @ X105 @ tptp0 )
=> ? [X106: $i,X107: $i] :
( ( ( occurrence_of @ X107 @ tptp2 )
=> ~ ? [X109: $i] :
( ( min_precedes @ X106 @ X109 @ tptp0 )
& ( occurrence_of @ X109 @ tptp1 ) ) )
& ( ( occurrence_of @ X107 @ tptp1 )
=> ~ ? [X108: $i] :
( ( min_precedes @ X106 @ X108 @ tptp0 )
& ( occurrence_of @ X108 @ tptp2 ) ) )
& ( leaf_occ @ X107 @ X105 ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X105: $i] :
( ( occurrence_of @ X105 @ tptp0 )
=> ? [X106: $i,X107: $i] :
( ( ( occurrence_of @ X107 @ tptp2 )
=> ~ ? [X109: $i] :
( ( min_precedes @ X106 @ X109 @ tptp0 )
& ( occurrence_of @ X109 @ tptp1 ) ) )
& ( ( occurrence_of @ X107 @ tptp1 )
=> ~ ? [X108: $i] :
( ( min_precedes @ X106 @ X108 @ tptp0 )
& ( occurrence_of @ X108 @ tptp2 ) ) )
& ( leaf_occ @ X107 @ X105 ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[goals]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl25,plain,
occurrence_of @ sk__4 @ tptp0,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(sos_32,axiom,
! [X101: $i] :
( ( occurrence_of @ X101 @ tptp0 )
=> ? [X102: $i,X103: $i,X104: $i] :
( ( leaf_occ @ X104 @ X101 )
& ( next_subocc @ X103 @ X104 @ tptp0 )
& ( ( occurrence_of @ X104 @ tptp2 )
| ( occurrence_of @ X104 @ tptp1 ) )
& ( next_subocc @ X102 @ X103 @ tptp0 )
& ( occurrence_of @ X103 @ tptp4 )
& ( root_occ @ X102 @ X101 )
& ( occurrence_of @ X102 @ tptp3 ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( leaf_occ @ ( sk__3 @ X0 ) @ X0 )
| ~ ( occurrence_of @ X0 @ tptp0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[sos_32]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl15_001,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( leaf_occ @ ( sk__3 @ X0 ) @ X0 )
| ~ ( occurrence_of @ X0 @ tptp0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[sos_32]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl30,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( min_precedes @ X0 @ ( sk__5 @ X0 ) @ tptp0 )
| ( min_precedes @ X0 @ ( sk__6 @ X0 ) @ tptp0 )
| ~ ( leaf_occ @ X1 @ sk__4 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl125,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( occurrence_of @ sk__4 @ tptp0 )
| ( min_precedes @ X0 @ ( sk__6 @ X0 ) @ tptp0 )
| ( min_precedes @ X0 @ ( sk__5 @ X0 ) @ tptp0 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl15,zip_derived_cl30]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl25_002,plain,
occurrence_of @ sk__4 @ tptp0,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl126,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( min_precedes @ X0 @ ( sk__6 @ X0 ) @ tptp0 )
| ( min_precedes @ X0 @ ( sk__5 @ X0 ) @ tptp0 ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl125,zip_derived_cl25]) ).
thf(sos_09,axiom,
! [X31: $i,X32: $i,X33: $i] :
( ( ( occurrence_of @ X31 @ X33 )
& ( leaf_occ @ X32 @ X31 ) )
=> ~ ? [X34: $i] : ( min_precedes @ X32 @ X34 @ X33 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ~ ( leaf_occ @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( occurrence_of @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( min_precedes @ X0 @ X3 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[sos_09]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl159,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( min_precedes @ X0 @ ( sk__6 @ X0 ) @ tptp0 )
| ~ ( occurrence_of @ X1 @ tptp0 )
| ~ ( leaf_occ @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl126,zip_derived_cl6]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6_003,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ~ ( leaf_occ @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( occurrence_of @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( min_precedes @ X0 @ X3 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[sos_09]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl162,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( leaf_occ @ X0 @ X1 )
| ~ ( occurrence_of @ X1 @ tptp0 ) ),
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl159,zip_derived_cl6]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl163,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( occurrence_of @ X0 @ tptp0 )
| ~ ( occurrence_of @ X0 @ tptp0 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl15,zip_derived_cl162]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl164,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
~ ( occurrence_of @ X0 @ tptp0 ),
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl163]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl166,plain,
$false,
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl25,zip_derived_cl164]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.17 % Problem : PRO010+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.18 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XxeHIudu9v true
% 0.17/0.40 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.40 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.40 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.40 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 18:42:28 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.40 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.17/0.40 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.40 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.24/0.40 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.24/0.40 % Running in FO mode
% 0.24/0.71 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.24/0.71 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.24/0.71 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.24/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.59/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.59/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.59/0.85 % Solved by fo/fo4.sh.
% 0.59/0.85 % done 77 iterations in 0.036s
% 0.59/0.85 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.59/0.85 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 % Terminating...
% 0.60/0.91 % Runner terminated.
% 0.60/0.92 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------