TSTP Solution File: PRO009+2 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : PRO009+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:53:45 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 7.75s 2.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 47
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 100 ( 18 unt; 40 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 148 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 166 ( 78 ~; 63 |; 18 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 65 ( 34 >; 31 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 19 ( 17 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 23 ( 23 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 (; 56 !; 8 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ next_subocc > min_precedes > subactivity_occurrence > subactivity > root_occ > root > precedes > occurrence_of > leaf_occ > leaf > earlier > atocc > legal > atomic > arboreal > activity_occurrence > activity > #nlpp > tptp4 > tptp3 > tptp2 > tptp1 > tptp0 > #skF_7 > #skF_16 > #skF_6 > #skF_1 > #skF_18 > #skF_12 > #skF_3 > #skF_13 > #skF_14 > #skF_15 > #skF_10 > #skF_8 > #skF_11 > #skF_9 > #skF_17 > #skF_2 > #skF_5 > #skF_4
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_7',type,
'#skF_7': $i > $i ).
tff(arboreal,type,
arboreal: $i > $o ).
tff('#skF_16',type,
'#skF_16': $i > $i ).
tff(tptp1,type,
tptp1: $i ).
tff('#skF_6',type,
'#skF_6': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_18',type,
'#skF_18': $i ).
tff(subactivity,type,
subactivity: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(root,type,
root: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(tptp2,type,
tptp2: $i ).
tff(leaf,type,
leaf: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_12',type,
'#skF_12': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(tptp0,type,
tptp0: $i ).
tff(root_occ,type,
root_occ: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(tptp3,type,
tptp3: $i ).
tff('#skF_3',type,
'#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_13',type,
'#skF_13': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(occurrence_of,type,
occurrence_of: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(atomic,type,
atomic: $i > $o ).
tff('#skF_14',type,
'#skF_14': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(tptp4,type,
tptp4: $i ).
tff('#skF_15',type,
'#skF_15': $i > $i ).
tff(legal,type,
legal: $i > $o ).
tff(earlier,type,
earlier: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(activity_occurrence,type,
activity_occurrence: $i > $o ).
tff('#skF_10',type,
'#skF_10': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_8',type,
'#skF_8': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_11',type,
'#skF_11': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(leaf_occ,type,
leaf_occ: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_9',type,
'#skF_9': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_17',type,
'#skF_17': $i > $i ).
tff(activity,type,
activity: $i > $o ).
tff(min_precedes,type,
min_precedes: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(precedes,type,
precedes: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(subactivity_occurrence,type,
subactivity_occurrence: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(next_subocc,type,
next_subocc: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(atocc,type,
atocc: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff('#skF_5',type,
'#skF_5': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff('#skF_4',type,
'#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(f_321,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X99] :
( occurrence_of(X99,tptp0)
=> ? [X100,X101] :
( occurrence_of(X100,tptp3)
& root_occ(X100,X99)
& ( occurrence_of(X101,tptp2)
| occurrence_of(X101,tptp1) )
& min_precedes(X100,X101,tptp0)
& leaf_occ(X101,X99) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
tff(f_286,axiom,
! [X95] :
( occurrence_of(X95,tptp0)
=> ? [X96,X97,X98] :
( occurrence_of(X96,tptp3)
& root_occ(X96,X95)
& occurrence_of(X97,tptp4)
& next_subocc(X96,X97,tptp0)
& ( occurrence_of(X98,tptp2)
| occurrence_of(X98,tptp1) )
& next_subocc(X97,X98,tptp0)
& leaf_occ(X98,X95) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_32) ).
tff(f_65,axiom,
! [X15,X16,X17] :
( next_subocc(X15,X16,X17)
<=> ( min_precedes(X15,X16,X17)
& ~ ? [X18] :
( min_precedes(X15,X18,X17)
& min_precedes(X18,X16,X17) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_04) ).
tff(f_109,axiom,
! [X35,X36] :
( leaf_occ(X35,X36)
<=> ? [X37] :
( occurrence_of(X36,X37)
& subactivity_occurrence(X35,X36)
& leaf(X35,X37) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_11) ).
tff(f_184,axiom,
! [X64,X65,X66] :
( ( occurrence_of(X64,X65)
& occurrence_of(X64,X66) )
=> ( X65 = X66 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_22) ).
tff(f_100,axiom,
! [X32,X33] :
( root_occ(X32,X33)
<=> ? [X34] :
( occurrence_of(X33,X34)
& subactivity_occurrence(X32,X33)
& root(X32,X34) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_10) ).
tff(f_30,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( min_precedes(X0,X1,X3)
& min_precedes(X1,X2,X3) )
=> min_precedes(X0,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos) ).
tff(c_166,plain,
occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_321]) ).
tff(c_140,plain,
! [X95_110] :
( occurrence_of('#skF_15'(X95_110),tptp3)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_110,tptp0) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_286]) ).
tff(c_138,plain,
! [X95_110] :
( root_occ('#skF_15'(X95_110),X95_110)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_110,tptp0) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_286]) ).
tff(c_647,plain,
! [X95_236] :
( next_subocc('#skF_15'(X95_236),'#skF_16'(X95_236),tptp0)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_236,tptp0) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_286]) ).
tff(c_12,plain,
! [X15_16,X16_17,X17_18] :
( min_precedes(X15_16,X16_17,X17_18)
| ~ next_subocc(X15_16,X16_17,X17_18) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_65]) ).
tff(c_865,plain,
! [X95_261] :
( min_precedes('#skF_15'(X95_261),'#skF_16'(X95_261),tptp0)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_261,tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_647,c_12]) ).
tff(c_170,plain,
! [X101_117,X100_116] :
( ~ occurrence_of(X101_117,tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ(X101_117,'#skF_18')
| ~ min_precedes(X100_116,X101_117,tptp0)
| ~ root_occ(X100_116,'#skF_18')
| ~ occurrence_of(X100_116,tptp3) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_321]) ).
tff(c_927,plain,
! [X95_270] :
( ~ occurrence_of('#skF_16'(X95_270),tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ('#skF_16'(X95_270),'#skF_18')
| ~ root_occ('#skF_15'(X95_270),'#skF_18')
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_15'(X95_270),tptp3)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_270,tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_865,c_170]) ).
tff(c_934,plain,
( ~ occurrence_of('#skF_16'('#skF_18'),tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ('#skF_16'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18')
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),tptp3)
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_927]) ).
tff(c_940,plain,
( ~ occurrence_of('#skF_16'('#skF_18'),tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ('#skF_16'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18')
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),tptp3) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_166,c_934]) ).
tff(c_1141,plain,
~ occurrence_of('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),tptp3),
inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_940]) ).
tff(c_1144,plain,
~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_140,c_1141]) ).
tff(c_1148,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_166,c_1144]) ).
tff(c_1150,plain,
occurrence_of('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),tptp3),
inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_940]) ).
tff(c_128,plain,
! [X95_110] :
( leaf_occ('#skF_17'(X95_110),X95_110)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_110,tptp0) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_286]) ).
tff(c_48,plain,
! [X36_41,X35_40] :
( occurrence_of(X36_41,'#skF_3'(X35_40,X36_41))
| ~ leaf_occ(X35_40,X36_41) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_109]) ).
tff(c_406,plain,
! [X66_215,X65_216,X64_217] :
( ( X66_215 = X65_216 )
| ~ occurrence_of(X64_217,X66_215)
| ~ occurrence_of(X64_217,X65_216) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_184]) ).
tff(c_425,plain,
! [X65_218] :
( ( tptp0 = X65_218 )
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',X65_218) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_166,c_406]) ).
tff(c_482,plain,
! [X35_220] :
( ( '#skF_3'(X35_220,'#skF_18') = tptp0 )
| ~ leaf_occ(X35_220,'#skF_18') ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_425]) ).
tff(c_486,plain,
( ( '#skF_3'('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18') = tptp0 )
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_482]) ).
tff(c_489,plain,
'#skF_3'('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18') = tptp0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_166,c_486]) ).
tff(c_44,plain,
! [X35_40,X36_41] :
( leaf(X35_40,'#skF_3'(X35_40,X36_41))
| ~ leaf_occ(X35_40,X36_41) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_109]) ).
tff(c_514,plain,
( leaf('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),tptp0)
| ~ leaf_occ('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18') ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_489,c_44]) ).
tff(c_623,plain,
~ leaf_occ('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18'),
inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_514]) ).
tff(c_626,plain,
~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_623]) ).
tff(c_630,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_166,c_626]) ).
tff(c_632,plain,
leaf_occ('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18'),
inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_514]) ).
tff(c_132,plain,
! [X95_110] :
( occurrence_of('#skF_17'(X95_110),tptp1)
| occurrence_of('#skF_17'(X95_110),tptp2)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_110,tptp0) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_286]) ).
tff(c_40,plain,
! [X33_36,X32_35] :
( occurrence_of(X33_36,'#skF_2'(X32_35,X33_36))
| ~ root_occ(X32_35,X33_36) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_100]) ).
tff(c_474,plain,
! [X32_219] :
( ( '#skF_2'(X32_219,'#skF_18') = tptp0 )
| ~ root_occ(X32_219,'#skF_18') ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_425]) ).
tff(c_478,plain,
( ( '#skF_2'('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18') = tptp0 )
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_474]) ).
tff(c_481,plain,
'#skF_2'('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18') = tptp0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_166,c_478]) ).
tff(c_36,plain,
! [X32_35,X33_36] :
( root(X32_35,'#skF_2'(X32_35,X33_36))
| ~ root_occ(X32_35,X33_36) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_100]) ).
tff(c_499,plain,
( root('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),tptp0)
| ~ root_occ('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18') ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_481,c_36]) ).
tff(c_660,plain,
~ root_occ('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18'),
inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_499]) ).
tff(c_663,plain,
~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_660]) ).
tff(c_667,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_166,c_663]) ).
tff(c_669,plain,
root_occ('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18'),
inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_499]) ).
tff(c_657,plain,
! [X95_236] :
( min_precedes('#skF_15'(X95_236),'#skF_16'(X95_236),tptp0)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_236,tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_647,c_12]) ).
tff(c_709,plain,
! [X95_239] :
( next_subocc('#skF_16'(X95_239),'#skF_17'(X95_239),tptp0)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_239,tptp0) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_286]) ).
tff(c_719,plain,
! [X95_239] :
( min_precedes('#skF_16'(X95_239),'#skF_17'(X95_239),tptp0)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_239,tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_709,c_12]) ).
tff(c_2357,plain,
! [X0_484,X2_485,X3_486,X1_487] :
( min_precedes(X0_484,X2_485,X3_486)
| ~ min_precedes(X1_487,X2_485,X3_486)
| ~ min_precedes(X0_484,X1_487,X3_486) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).
tff(c_3752,plain,
! [X0_631,X95_632] :
( min_precedes(X0_631,'#skF_17'(X95_632),tptp0)
| ~ min_precedes(X0_631,'#skF_16'(X95_632),tptp0)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_632,tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_719,c_2357]) ).
tff(c_3811,plain,
! [X95_635] :
( min_precedes('#skF_15'(X95_635),'#skF_17'(X95_635),tptp0)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_635,tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_657,c_3752]) ).
tff(c_3978,plain,
! [X95_651] :
( ~ occurrence_of('#skF_17'(X95_651),tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ('#skF_17'(X95_651),'#skF_18')
| ~ root_occ('#skF_15'(X95_651),'#skF_18')
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_15'(X95_651),tptp3)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_651,tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3811,c_170]) ).
tff(c_3985,plain,
( ~ occurrence_of('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),tptp2)
| ~ leaf_occ('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18')
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),tptp3)
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_669,c_3978]) ).
tff(c_3995,plain,
~ occurrence_of('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),tptp2),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_166,c_1150,c_632,c_3985]) ).
tff(c_4001,plain,
( occurrence_of('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),tptp1)
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_132,c_3995]) ).
tff(c_4004,plain,
occurrence_of('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),tptp1),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_166,c_4001]) ).
tff(c_168,plain,
! [X101_117,X100_116] :
( ~ occurrence_of(X101_117,tptp1)
| ~ leaf_occ(X101_117,'#skF_18')
| ~ min_precedes(X100_116,X101_117,tptp0)
| ~ root_occ(X100_116,'#skF_18')
| ~ occurrence_of(X100_116,tptp3) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_321]) ).
tff(c_4160,plain,
! [X95_655] :
( ~ occurrence_of('#skF_17'(X95_655),tptp1)
| ~ leaf_occ('#skF_17'(X95_655),'#skF_18')
| ~ root_occ('#skF_15'(X95_655),'#skF_18')
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_15'(X95_655),tptp3)
| ~ occurrence_of(X95_655,tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3811,c_168]) ).
tff(c_4167,plain,
( ~ occurrence_of('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),tptp1)
| ~ leaf_occ('#skF_17'('#skF_18'),'#skF_18')
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_15'('#skF_18'),tptp3)
| ~ occurrence_of('#skF_18',tptp0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_669,c_4160]) ).
tff(c_4178,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_166,c_1150,c_632,c_4004,c_4167]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : PRO009+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 22:21:23 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 7.75/2.86 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.75/2.87
% 7.75/2.87 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.75/2.90
% 7.75/2.90 Inference rules
% 7.75/2.90 ----------------------
% 7.75/2.90 #Ref : 0
% 7.75/2.90 #Sup : 881
% 7.75/2.90 #Fact : 0
% 7.75/2.90 #Define : 0
% 7.75/2.90 #Split : 13
% 7.75/2.90 #Chain : 0
% 7.75/2.90 #Close : 0
% 7.75/2.90
% 7.75/2.90 Ordering : KBO
% 7.75/2.90
% 7.75/2.90 Simplification rules
% 7.75/2.90 ----------------------
% 7.75/2.90 #Subsume : 237
% 7.75/2.90 #Demod : 300
% 7.75/2.90 #Tautology : 228
% 7.75/2.90 #SimpNegUnit : 21
% 7.75/2.90 #BackRed : 3
% 7.75/2.90
% 7.75/2.90 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 7.75/2.90 #Strategies tried : 1
% 7.75/2.90
% 7.75/2.90 Timing (in seconds)
% 7.75/2.90 ----------------------
% 7.75/2.90 Preprocessing : 0.63
% 7.75/2.90 Parsing : 0.33
% 7.75/2.90 CNF conversion : 0.05
% 7.75/2.90 Main loop : 1.20
% 7.75/2.90 Inferencing : 0.46
% 7.75/2.90 Reduction : 0.33
% 7.75/2.91 Demodulation : 0.22
% 7.75/2.91 BG Simplification : 0.05
% 7.75/2.91 Subsumption : 0.27
% 7.75/2.91 Abstraction : 0.04
% 7.75/2.91 MUC search : 0.00
% 7.75/2.91 Cooper : 0.00
% 7.75/2.91 Total : 1.89
% 7.75/2.91 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 7.75/2.91 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 7.75/2.91 Index Matching : 0.00
% 7.75/2.91 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------