TSTP Solution File: PRO007+2 by Refute---2015
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Refute---2015
% Problem : PRO007+2 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_refute %d %s
% Computer : n025.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 16091.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Apr 14 02:25:45 EDT 2016
% Result : Timeout 295.57s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PRO007+2 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.02/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_refute %d %s
% 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n025.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 16091.75MB
% 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Wed Apr 6 08:39:54 CDT 2016
% 0.02/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 6.30/5.86 > val it = (): unit
% 6.50/6.09 Trying to find a model that refutes: bnd_occurrence_of X99 bnd_tptp0 -->
% 6.50/6.09 (EX X100 X101.
% 6.50/6.09 (((((bnd_occurrence_of X100 bnd_tptp3 & bnd_root_occ X100 X99) &
% 6.50/6.09 (bnd_occurrence_of X101 bnd_tptp1 |
% 6.50/6.09 bnd_occurrence_of X101 bnd_tptp2)) &
% 6.50/6.09 bnd_min_precedes X100 X101 bnd_tptp0) &
% 6.50/6.09 bnd_leaf_occ X101 X99) &
% 6.50/6.09 (bnd_occurrence_of X101 bnd_tptp1 -->
% 6.50/6.09 ~ (EX X102.
% 6.50/6.09 bnd_occurrence_of X102 bnd_tptp2 &
% 6.50/6.09 bnd_min_precedes X100 X102 bnd_tptp0))) &
% 6.50/6.09 (bnd_occurrence_of X101 bnd_tptp2 -->
% 6.50/6.09 ~ (EX X103.
% 6.50/6.09 bnd_occurrence_of X103 bnd_tptp1 &
% 6.50/6.09 bnd_min_precedes X100 X103 bnd_tptp0)))
% 7.50/7.00 Unfolded term: [| ~ bnd_tptp1 = bnd_tptp2; ~ bnd_tptp3 = bnd_tptp2;
% 7.50/7.00 ~ bnd_tptp3 = bnd_tptp1; ~ bnd_tptp4 = bnd_tptp2;
% 7.50/7.00 ~ bnd_tptp4 = bnd_tptp1; ~ bnd_tptp4 = bnd_tptp3; bnd_atomic bnd_tptp3;
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_atomic bnd_tptp2; bnd_atomic bnd_tptp1; bnd_atomic bnd_tptp4;
% 7.50/7.00 ~ bnd_atomic bnd_tptp0; bnd_activity bnd_tptp0;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X95.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X95 bnd_tptp0 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X96 X97 X98.
% 7.50/7.00 (((((bnd_occurrence_of X96 bnd_tptp3 & bnd_root_occ X96 X95) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X97 bnd_tptp4) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_next_subocc X96 X97 bnd_tptp0) &
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_occurrence_of X98 bnd_tptp1 |
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X98 bnd_tptp2)) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_next_subocc X97 X98 bnd_tptp0) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_leaf_occ X98 X95);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X94. bnd_activity X94 --> bnd_subactivity X94 X94;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X91 X92.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X92 X91 & ~ bnd_atomic X91 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X93. bnd_root X93 X91 & bnd_subactivity_occurrence X93 X92);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X89 X90.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X90 X89 -->
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_activity X89 & bnd_activity_occurrence X90;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X85 X86 X87 X88.
% 7.50/7.00 (((bnd_occurrence_of X86 X85 & bnd_arboreal X87) & bnd_arboreal X88) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X87 X86) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X88 X86 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_min_precedes X87 X88 X85 | bnd_min_precedes X88 X87 X85) |
% 7.50/7.00 X87 = X88;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X82 X83.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_root X83 X82 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X84. bnd_subactivity X84 X82 & bnd_atocc X83 X84);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X77 X78 X79.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_min_precedes X78 X79 X77 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X80 X81.
% 7.50/7.00 ((bnd_subactivity X80 X77 & bnd_subactivity X81 X77) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_atocc X78 X80) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_atocc X79 X81);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X74 X75.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_leaf X74 X75 & ~ bnd_atomic X75 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X76. bnd_occurrence_of X76 X75 & bnd_leaf_occ X74 X76);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X70 X71 X72.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_min_precedes X71 X72 X70 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X73.
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_occurrence_of X73 X70 & bnd_subactivity_occurrence X71 X73) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X72 X73);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X67 X68.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_leaf X67 X68 & ~ bnd_atomic X68 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X69. bnd_occurrence_of X69 X68 & bnd_leaf_occ X67 X69);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X64 X65 X66.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X64 X65 & bnd_occurrence_of X64 X66 --> X65 = X66;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X60 X61 X62.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X60 X62 & bnd_leaf_occ X61 X60 -->
% 7.50/7.00 ~ (EX X63. bnd_min_precedes X61 X63 X62);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X56 X57 X58.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X56 X58 & bnd_root_occ X57 X56 -->
% 7.50/7.00 ~ (EX X59. bnd_min_precedes X59 X57 X58);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X54 X55.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_subactivity_occurrence X54 X55 -->
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_activity_occurrence X54 & bnd_activity_occurrence X55;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X52.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_activity_occurrence X52 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X53. bnd_activity X53 & bnd_occurrence_of X52 X53);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X51. bnd_legal X51 --> bnd_arboreal X51;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X49 X50. bnd_atocc X49 X50 & bnd_legal X49 --> bnd_root X49 X50;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X46 X47.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_atocc X46 X47 =
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X48.
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_subactivity X47 X48 & bnd_atomic X48) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X46 X48);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X42 X43.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_leaf X42 X43 =
% 7.50/7.00 ((bnd_root X42 X43 | (EX X44. bnd_min_precedes X44 X42 X43)) &
% 7.50/7.00 ~ (EX X45. bnd_min_precedes X42 X45 X43));
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X40 X41.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X40 X41 --> bnd_arboreal X40 = bnd_atomic X41;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X38 X39. bnd_root X38 X39 --> bnd_legal X38;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X35 X36.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_leaf_occ X35 X36 =
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X37.
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_occurrence_of X36 X37 & bnd_subactivity_occurrence X35 X36) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_leaf X35 X37);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X32 X33.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_root_occ X32 X33 =
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X34.
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_occurrence_of X33 X34 & bnd_subactivity_occurrence X32 X33) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_root X32 X34);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X30 X31. bnd_earlier X30 X31 --> ~ bnd_earlier X31 X30;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X28 X29.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_precedes X28 X29 = (bnd_earlier X28 X29 & bnd_legal X29);
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X25 X26 X27. bnd_min_precedes X25 X26 X27 --> ~ bnd_root X26 X27;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X22 X23 X24. bnd_min_precedes X22 X23 X24 --> bnd_precedes X22 X23;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X19 X20 X21.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_next_subocc X19 X20 X21 --> bnd_arboreal X19 & bnd_arboreal X20;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X15 X16 X17.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_next_subocc X15 X16 X17 =
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_min_precedes X15 X16 X17 &
% 7.50/7.00 ~ (EX X18.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_min_precedes X15 X18 X17 & bnd_min_precedes X18 X16 X17));
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X11 X12 X13 X14.
% 7.50/7.00 ((bnd_occurrence_of X13 X14 & ~ bnd_atomic X14) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_leaf_occ X11 X13) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_leaf_occ X12 X13 -->
% 7.50/7.00 X11 = X12;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X7 X8 X9 X10.
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_occurrence_of X9 X10 & bnd_root_occ X7 X9) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_root_occ X8 X9 -->
% 7.50/7.00 X7 = X8;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X4 X5 X6.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_earlier X4 X5 & bnd_earlier X5 X6 --> bnd_earlier X4 X6;
% 7.50/7.00 ALL X0 X1 X2 X3.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_min_precedes X0 X1 X3 & bnd_min_precedes X1 X2 X3 -->
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_min_precedes X0 X2 X3 |]
% 7.50/7.00 ==> bnd_occurrence_of X99 bnd_tptp0 -->
% 7.50/7.00 (EX X100 X101.
% 7.50/7.00 (((((bnd_occurrence_of X100 bnd_tptp3 & bnd_root_occ X100 X99) &
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_occurrence_of X101 bnd_tptp1 |
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X101 bnd_tptp2)) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_min_precedes X100 X101 bnd_tptp0) &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_leaf_occ X101 X99) &
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_occurrence_of X101 bnd_tptp1 -->
% 7.50/7.00 ~ (EX X102.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X102 bnd_tptp2 &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_min_precedes X100 X102 bnd_tptp0))) &
% 7.50/7.00 (bnd_occurrence_of X101 bnd_tptp2 -->
% 7.50/7.00 ~ (EX X103.
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_occurrence_of X103 bnd_tptp1 &
% 7.50/7.00 bnd_min_precedes X100 X103 bnd_tptp0)))
% 7.50/7.00 Adding axioms...
% 7.50/7.01 Typedef.type_definition_def
% 12.52/12.10 ...done.
% 12.62/12.11 Ground types: ?'b, TPTP_Interpret.ind
% 12.62/12.11 Translating term (sizes: 1, 1) ...
% 16.22/15.73 Invoking SAT solver...
% 16.22/15.73 No model exists.
% 16.22/15.73 Translating term (sizes: 2, 1) ...
% 20.52/20.06 Invoking SAT solver...
% 20.52/20.06 No model exists.
% 20.52/20.06 Translating term (sizes: 1, 2) ...
% 42.97/42.41 Invoking SAT solver...
% 42.97/42.41 No model exists.
% 42.97/42.41 Translating term (sizes: 3, 1) ...
% 49.58/49.05 Invoking SAT solver...
% 49.58/49.05 No model exists.
% 49.58/49.05 Translating term (sizes: 2, 2) ...
% 79.66/79.09 Invoking SAT solver...
% 79.66/79.09 No model exists.
% 79.66/79.09 Translating term (sizes: 1, 3) ...
% 171.82/170.81 Invoking SAT solver...
% 171.92/170.91 No model exists.
% 171.92/170.91 Translating term (sizes: 4, 1) ...
% 185.81/184.71 Invoking SAT solver...
% 185.81/184.71 No model exists.
% 185.81/184.71 Translating term (sizes: 3, 2) ...
% 295.57/293.69 Invoking SAT solver...
% 295.57/293.69 No model exists.
% 295.57/293.69 Translating term (sizes: 2, 3) ...
% 300.03/298.03 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/lib/scripts/run-polyml-5.5.2: line 82: 55784 CPU time limit exceeded (core dumped) "$ISABELLE_HOME/lib/scripts/feeder" -p -h "$MLTEXT" -t "$MLEXIT" $FEEDER_OPTS
% 300.03/298.03 55785 (core dumped) | { read FPID; "$POLY" -q -i $ML_OPTIONS; RC="$?"; kill -TERM "$FPID"; exit "$RC"; }
% 300.03/298.04 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/src/HOL/TPTP/lib/Tools/tptp_refute: line 26: 55720 Exit 152 "$ISABELLE_PROCESS" -q -e "use_thy \"/tmp/$SCRATCH\"; exit 1;" HOL-TPTP
% 300.03/298.04 55721 CPU time limit exceeded (core dumped) | grep --line-buffered -v "^###\|^PROOF FAILED for depth\|^Failure node\|inferences so far. Searching to depth\|^val \|^Loading theory\|^Warning-The type of\|^ monotype.$"
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------