TSTP Solution File: PHI014+1 by leanCoP---2.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : leanCoP---2.2
% Problem : PHI014+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:47:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.32s 1.41s
% Output : Proof 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : PHI014+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 00:41:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.32/1.41 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/1.42 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/1.42
% 0.40/1.42 %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/1.42 fof(god_exists, conjecture, exemplifies_property(existence, god), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', god_exists)).
% 0.40/1.42 fof(description_theorem_2, axiom, ! [_13894] : (property(_13894) => ? [_13909] : (object(_13909) & is_the(_13909, _13894)) => ! [_13934] : (object(_13934) => is_the(_13934, _13894) => exemplifies_property(_13894, _13934))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', description_theorem_2)).
% 0.40/1.42 fof(description_is_property_and_described_is_object, axiom, ! [_14180, _14183] : (is_the(_14180, _14183) => property(_14183) & object(_14180)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', description_is_property_and_described_is_object)).
% 0.40/1.42 fof(definition_god, axiom, is_the(god, none_greater), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', definition_god)).
% 0.40/1.42 fof(premise_2, axiom, ! [_14402] : (object(_14402) => is_the(_14402, none_greater) & ~ exemplifies_property(existence, _14402) => ? [_14439] : (object(_14439) & exemplifies_relation(greater_than, _14439, _14402) & exemplifies_property(conceivable, _14439))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', premise_2)).
% 0.40/1.42 fof(definition_none_greater, axiom, ! [_14707] : (object(_14707) => (exemplifies_property(none_greater, _14707) <=> exemplifies_property(conceivable, _14707) & ~ ? [_14744] : (object(_14744) & exemplifies_relation(greater_than, _14744, _14707) & exemplifies_property(conceivable, _14744)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', definition_none_greater)).
% 0.40/1.42
% 0.40/1.42 cnf(1, plain, [exemplifies_property(existence, god)], clausify(god_exists)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf(2, plain, [property(_3994), is_the(_4114, _3994), object(_4114), object(_4266), is_the(_4266, _3994), -(exemplifies_property(_3994, _4266))], clausify(description_theorem_2)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf(3, plain, [is_the(_4619, _4668), -(property(_4668))], clausify(description_is_property_and_described_is_object)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf(4, plain, [is_the(_4619, _4668), -(object(_4619))], clausify(description_is_property_and_described_is_object)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf(5, plain, [-(is_the(god, none_greater))], clausify(definition_god)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf(6, plain, [object(_5621), -(object(2 ^ [_5621])), is_the(_5621, none_greater), -(exemplifies_property(existence, _5621))], clausify(premise_2)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf(7, plain, [object(_5621), -(exemplifies_relation(greater_than, 2 ^ [_5621], _5621)), is_the(_5621, none_greater), -(exemplifies_property(existence, _5621))], clausify(premise_2)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf(8, plain, [object(_5621), -(exemplifies_property(conceivable, 2 ^ [_5621])), is_the(_5621, none_greater), -(exemplifies_property(existence, _5621))], clausify(premise_2)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf(9, plain, [object(_4969), exemplifies_property(none_greater, _4969), object(_5204), exemplifies_relation(greater_than, _5204, _4969), exemplifies_property(conceivable, _5204)], clausify(definition_none_greater)).
% 0.40/1.42
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1',plain,[exemplifies_property(existence, god)],start(1)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1',plain,[-(exemplifies_property(existence, god)), object(god), -(exemplifies_relation(greater_than, 2 ^ [god], god)), is_the(god, none_greater)],extension(7,bind([[_5621], [god]]))).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.1',plain,[-(object(god)), is_the(god, none_greater)],extension(4,bind([[_4619, _4668], [god, none_greater]]))).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.1.1',plain,[-(is_the(god, none_greater))],extension(5)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2',plain,[exemplifies_relation(greater_than, 2 ^ [god], god), object(god), exemplifies_property(none_greater, god), object(2 ^ [god]), exemplifies_property(conceivable, 2 ^ [god])],extension(9,bind([[_4969, _5204], [god, 2 ^ [god]]]))).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.1',plain,[-(object(god))],lemmata('1.1')).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.2',plain,[-(exemplifies_property(none_greater, god)), property(none_greater), is_the(god, none_greater), object(god), object(god), is_the(god, none_greater)],extension(2,bind([[_4114, _4266, _3994], [god, god, none_greater]]))).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.2.1',plain,[-(property(none_greater)), is_the(god, none_greater)],extension(3,bind([[_4619, _4668], [god, none_greater]]))).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.2.1.1',plain,[-(is_the(god, none_greater))],extension(5)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.2.2',plain,[-(is_the(god, none_greater))],extension(5)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.2.3',plain,[-(object(god))],lemmata('1.1.2')).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.2.4',plain,[-(object(god))],lemmata('1.1.2.2')).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.2.5',plain,[-(is_the(god, none_greater))],extension(5)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.3',plain,[-(object(2 ^ [god])), object(god), is_the(god, none_greater), -(exemplifies_property(existence, god))],extension(6,bind([[_5621], [god]]))).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.3.1',plain,[-(object(god))],lemmata('1.1.2')).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.3.2',plain,[-(is_the(god, none_greater))],extension(5)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.3.3',plain,[exemplifies_property(existence, god)],extension(1)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.4',plain,[-(exemplifies_property(conceivable, 2 ^ [god])), object(god), is_the(god, none_greater), -(exemplifies_property(existence, god))],extension(8,bind([[_5621], [god]]))).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.4.1',plain,[-(object(god))],lemmata('1.1.2')).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.4.2',plain,[-(is_the(god, none_greater))],extension(5)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.2.4.3',plain,[exemplifies_property(existence, god)],extension(1)).
% 0.40/1.42 cnf('1.1.3',plain,[-(is_the(god, none_greater))],extension(5)).
% 0.40/1.42 %-----------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/1.43
% 0.40/1.43 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------