TSTP Solution File: PHI012+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : PHI012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:45:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.33s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 13 unt; 4 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 67 ( 7 equ; 39 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( exemplifies_property(none_greater,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7xtazgua/input.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
exemplifies_property(none_greater,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7xtazgua/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
object(esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7xtazgua/input.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( object(esk3_1(X1))
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7xtazgua/input.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( ~ object(X1)
| ~ object(X2)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(conceivable,X2)
| ~ exemplifies_relation(greater_than,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7xtazgua/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( X1 = X2
| exemplifies_relation(greater_than,X2,X1)
| exemplifies_relation(greater_than,X1,X2)
| ~ object(X2)
| ~ object(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7xtazgua/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( exemplifies_property(conceivable,X1)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7xtazgua/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( esk3_1(X1) != X1
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-7xtazgua/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( exemplifies_property(none_greater,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
exemplifies_property(none_greater,esk2_0),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
object(esk2_0),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( object(esk3_1(X1))
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1) ),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ object(X1)
| ~ object(X2)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(conceivable,X2)
| ~ exemplifies_relation(greater_than,X2,X1) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( X1 = X2
| exemplifies_relation(greater_than,X2,X1)
| exemplifies_relation(greater_than,X1,X2)
| ~ object(X2)
| ~ object(X1) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
exemplifies_property(none_greater,esk3_1(esk2_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
object(esk3_1(esk2_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( X1 = X2
| exemplifies_relation(greater_than,X1,X2)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(conceivable,X2)
| ~ object(X2)
| ~ object(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
exemplifies_property(none_greater,esk3_1(esk3_1(esk2_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
object(esk3_1(esk3_1(esk2_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( exemplifies_property(conceivable,X1)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( esk3_1(X1) != X1
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(none_greater,X1) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( esk3_1(esk3_1(esk2_0)) = X1
| exemplifies_relation(greater_than,esk3_1(esk3_1(esk2_0)),X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(conceivable,X1)
| ~ object(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
exemplifies_property(conceivable,esk3_1(esk2_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
esk3_1(esk3_1(esk2_0)) != esk3_1(esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
exemplifies_relation(greater_than,esk3_1(esk3_1(esk2_0)),esk3_1(esk2_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_27])]),c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
exemplifies_property(conceivable,esk3_1(esk3_1(esk2_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_36]),c_0_26]),c_0_37]),c_0_30]),c_0_27])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : PHI012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 01:48:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.33/2.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.33/2.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.33/2.44 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.33/2.44 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 8.33/2.44 # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 8.33/2.44 #
% 8.33/2.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 8.33/2.44
% 8.33/2.44 # Proof found!
% 8.33/2.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.33/2.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.33/2.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.33/2.44
% 8.33/2.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.33/2.44 # User time : 0.034 s
% 8.33/2.44 # System time : 0.002 s
% 8.33/2.44 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 8.33/2.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 8.33/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------