TSTP Solution File: PHI009+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : PHI009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:45:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 13.19s 3.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 9 unt; 6 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 90 ( 8 equ; 61 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( is_the(X1,X2)
| exemplifies_property(X2,esk2_4(X2,X3,X1,X4))
| ~ property(X3)
| ~ property(X2)
| ~ object(X4)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X3,X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yq45zbo_/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
exemplifies_property(esk3_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yq45zbo_/input.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
object(esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yq45zbo_/input.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
property(esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yq45zbo_/input.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ object(X1)
| ~ is_the(X1,esk3_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yq45zbo_/input.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( is_the(X1,X2)
| object(esk2_4(X2,X3,X1,X4))
| ~ property(X3)
| ~ property(X2)
| ~ object(X4)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X3,X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yq45zbo_/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( is_the(X1,X2)
| esk2_4(X2,X3,X1,X4) != X4
| ~ property(X3)
| ~ property(X2)
| ~ object(X4)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X3,X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yq45zbo_/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk4_0
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(esk3_0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yq45zbo_/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( is_the(X1,X2)
| exemplifies_property(X2,esk2_4(X2,X3,X1,X4))
| ~ property(X3)
| ~ property(X2)
| ~ object(X4)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X3,X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X4) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
exemplifies_property(esk3_0,esk4_0),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
object(esk4_0),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
property(esk3_0),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( is_the(X1,X2)
| exemplifies_property(X2,esk2_4(X2,esk3_0,X1,esk4_0))
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,esk4_0)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ property(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ object(X1)
| ~ is_the(X1,esk3_0) ),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( exemplifies_property(esk3_0,esk2_4(esk3_0,esk3_0,X1,esk4_0))
| ~ object(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_25]),c_0_27])]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( is_the(X1,X2)
| object(esk2_4(X2,X3,X1,X4))
| ~ property(X3)
| ~ property(X2)
| ~ object(X4)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X3,X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X4) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( is_the(X1,X2)
| esk2_4(X2,X3,X1,X4) != X4
| ~ property(X3)
| ~ property(X2)
| ~ object(X4)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X3,X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X4) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk4_0
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(esk3_0,X1) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
exemplifies_property(esk3_0,esk2_4(esk3_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk4_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( is_the(X1,X2)
| object(esk2_4(X2,esk3_0,X1,esk4_0))
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,esk4_0)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ property(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( is_the(X1,X2)
| esk2_4(X2,esk3_0,X1,esk4_0) != esk4_0
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,esk4_0)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ property(X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( esk2_4(esk3_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk4_0) = esk4_0
| ~ object(esk2_4(esk3_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk4_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( object(esk2_4(esk3_0,esk3_0,X1,esk4_0))
| ~ object(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_25]),c_0_27])]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( esk2_4(esk3_0,esk3_0,X1,esk4_0) != esk4_0
| ~ object(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_25]),c_0_27])]),c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
esk2_4(esk3_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk4_0) = esk4_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.09 % Problem : PHI009+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.04/0.09 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 01:25:37 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 13.19/3.27 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 13.19/3.27 # No SInE strategy applied
% 13.19/3.27 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 13.19/3.27 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S08BA
% 13.19/3.27 # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 13.19/3.27 #
% 13.19/3.27 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 13.19/3.27 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.19/3.27
% 13.19/3.27 # Proof found!
% 13.19/3.27 # SZS status Theorem
% 13.19/3.27 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.19/3.27 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.19/3.27
% 13.19/3.27 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.19/3.27 # User time : 0.024 s
% 13.19/3.27 # System time : 0.009 s
% 13.19/3.27 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 13.19/3.27 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 13.19/3.27
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------