TSTP Solution File: NUN082+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUN082+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:24:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.85s 2.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   52 (  37 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   76 (  23 equ;  31 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   87 (  20 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = esk5_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_32,plain,
    r1(esk15_1(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_32) ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    r4(X1,esk16_1(X1),esk15_1(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_33) ).

cnf(i_0_34,plain,
    r1(esk16_1(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_34) ).

cnf(i_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ r1(X2)
    | ~ r1(X3)
    | ~ r2(X3,X4)
    | ~ r4(X5,X4,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_40) ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    ( X1 = esk14_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r4(X2,X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_29) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    r4(X1,X2,esk9_2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    r4(X1,esk8_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_22,plain,
    ( X1 = esk11_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r3(X2,X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_22) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    r3(X1,X2,esk4_2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    r1(esk13_1(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_26) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    r2(X1,esk8_2(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    r3(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1,esk6_2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    r3(X1,esk13_1(X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    ( r1(X1)
    | X1 != esk5_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8z2pg3wm/input.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( X1 = esk5_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    r1(esk15_1(X1)),
    i_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    r4(X1,esk16_1(X1),esk15_1(X1)),
    i_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    esk15_1(X1) = esk5_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    r1(esk16_1(X1)),
    i_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    r4(X1,esk16_1(X1),esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    esk16_1(X1) = esk5_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ r1(X2)
    | ~ r1(X3)
    | ~ r2(X3,X4)
    | ~ r4(X5,X4,X1) ),
    i_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( X1 = esk14_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r4(X2,X3,X1) ),
    i_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    r4(X1,esk5_0,esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    r4(X1,X2,esk9_2(X1,X2)),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r4(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(X4,X2)
    | ~ r1(X4)
    | ~ r1(X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    r4(X1,esk8_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2)),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( X1 = esk11_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r3(X2,X3,X1) ),
    i_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    r3(X1,X2,esk4_2(X1,X2)),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    esk14_2(X1,esk5_0) = esk5_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    esk14_2(X1,X2) = esk9_2(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_66]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    r1(esk13_1(X1)),
    i_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( ~ r2(X1,esk8_2(X2,X3))
    | ~ r1(esk6_2(X2,X3))
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    r2(X1,esk8_2(X2,X1)),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    esk11_2(X1,X2) = esk4_2(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    r3(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1,esk6_2(X1,X2)),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    esk9_2(X1,esk5_0) = esk5_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    r3(X1,esk13_1(X1),X1),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    esk13_1(X1) = esk5_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_73]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    ( ~ r1(esk6_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ r1(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    ( r1(X1)
    | X1 != esk5_0 ),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_83,plain,
    ( X1 = esk4_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r3(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_76]) ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    r3(esk5_0,X1,esk6_2(X1,esk5_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    r3(X1,esk5_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]) ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( esk6_2(X1,X2) != esk5_0
    | ~ r1(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]) ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    esk6_2(X1,esk5_0) = esk4_2(esk5_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    r1(esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_80]) ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    esk11_2(X1,esk5_0) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_85]) ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    esk4_2(esk5_0,X1) != esk5_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_87]),c_0_88])]) ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    esk4_2(X1,esk5_0) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_76]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_91]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUN082+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 04:58:33 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 6.85/2.31  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 6.85/2.31  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.85/2.31  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 6.85/2.31  
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof found!
% 6.85/2.31  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.85/2.31  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object total steps             : 52
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object clause steps            : 37
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object conjectures             : 3
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 15
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 15
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object generating inferences   : 14
% 6.85/2.31  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 10
% 6.85/2.31  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.85/2.31  # Parsed axioms                        : 28
% 6.85/2.31  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # Initial clauses                      : 28
% 6.85/2.31  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 6.85/2.31  # Processed clauses                    : 172
% 6.85/2.31  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # ...subsumed                          : 55
% 6.85/2.31  # ...remaining for further processing  : 117
% 6.85/2.31  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 6.85/2.31  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 6.85/2.31  # Backward-rewritten                   : 28
% 6.85/2.31  # Generated clauses                    : 254
% 6.85/2.31  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 233
% 6.85/2.31  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 19
% 6.85/2.31  # Paramodulations                      : 241
% 6.85/2.31  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # Equation resolutions                 : 13
% 6.85/2.31  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # Current number of processed clauses  : 85
% 6.85/2.31  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 24
% 6.85/2.31  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.85/2.31  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 6.85/2.31  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 55
% 6.85/2.31  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 72
% 6.85/2.31  # ...number of literals in the above   : 200
% 6.85/2.31  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # Current number of archived clauses   : 29
% 6.85/2.31  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1358
% 6.85/2.31  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1095
% 6.85/2.31  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 58
% 6.85/2.31  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 201
% 6.85/2.31  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 33
% 6.85/2.31  # BW rewrite match successes           : 18
% 6.85/2.31  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.85/2.31  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2642
% 6.85/2.31  
% 6.85/2.31  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.85/2.31  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 6.85/2.31  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 6.85/2.31  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 6.85/2.31  # ...preprocessing         : 0.010 s
% 6.85/2.31  # ...main loop             : 0.005 s
% 6.85/2.31  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 6.85/2.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------