TSTP Solution File: NUN081+2 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : NUN081+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:45:56 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   28
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  10 unt;  24 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  110 (  47   ~;  35   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   38 (  23   >;  15   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (  10 sgn;  18   !;  20   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    r1: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    r2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    r3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    r4: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk2_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk3_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk4_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk5_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    esk6_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    esk7_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    esk8_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    esk9_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    esk10_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    esk11_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    esk12_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    esk13_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    esk14_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    esk15_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    esk16_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    esk17_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    esk18_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    esk19_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    esk20_1: $i > $i ).

fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1) ).

fof(xplusyeqthree,conjecture,
    ? [X39,X22,X23] :
      ( r3(X39,X22,X23)
      & ? [X16] :
          ( X23 = X16
          & ? [X17] :
              ( r2(X17,X16)
              & ? [X25] :
                  ( r2(X25,X17)
                  & ? [X19] :
                      ( r1(X19)
                      & r2(X19,X25) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xplusyeqthree) ).

fof(axiom_4a,axiom,
    ! [X30] :
    ? [X31] :
      ( ? [X32] :
          ( r1(X32)
          & r3(X30,X32,X31) )
      & X31 = X30 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 != X4 )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X39,X22,X23] :
        ( r3(X39,X22,X23)
        & ? [X16] :
            ( X23 = X16
            & ? [X17] :
                ( r2(X17,X16)
                & ? [X25] :
                    ( r2(X25,X17)
                    & ? [X19] :
                        ( r1(X19)
                        & r2(X19,X25) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[xplusyeqthree]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X73] :
      ( r1(esk14_1(X73))
      & r3(X73,esk14_1(X73),esk13_1(X73))
      & esk13_1(X73) = X73 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X45] :
      ( ( r1(X45)
        | ~ r1(X45) )
      & ( X45 = esk1_0
        | ~ r1(X45) )
      & ( r1(X45)
        | X45 != esk1_0 )
      & ( X45 = esk1_0
        | X45 != esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X87,X88,X89,X90,X91,X92,X93] :
      ( ~ r3(X87,X88,X89)
      | X89 != X90
      | ~ r2(X91,X90)
      | ~ r2(X92,X91)
      | ~ r1(X93)
      | ~ r2(X93,X92) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    r3(X1,esk14_1(X1),esk13_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    esk13_1(X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X1 = esk1_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    r1(esk14_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r3(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 != X4
    | ~ r2(X5,X4)
    | ~ r2(X6,X5)
    | ~ r1(X7)
    | ~ r2(X7,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    r3(X1,esk14_1(X1),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    esk14_1(X1) = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 != X4 )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 = X4 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r3(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(X4,X5)
    | ~ r2(X5,X6)
    | ~ r2(X6,X3)
    | ~ r1(X4) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    r3(X1,esk1_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( r1(X1)
    | X1 != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X46,X48] :
      ( ( r2(X46,X48)
        | ~ r2(X46,X48) )
      & ( X48 = esk2_1(X46)
        | ~ r2(X46,X48) )
      & ( r2(X46,X48)
        | X48 != esk2_1(X46) )
      & ( X48 = esk2_1(X46)
        | X48 != esk2_1(X46) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r2(X3,X4)
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    r1(esk1_0),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( r2(X1,X2)
    | X2 != esk2_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ r2(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    r2(X1,esk2_1(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(esk2_1(X1),X2)
    | ~ r2(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2(esk2_1(esk2_1(esk1_0)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : NUN081+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun Aug 27 09:56:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.49  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.51  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.17/0.51  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.51  % Proof found
% 0.17/0.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.51  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.51  % Total time : 0.006000 s
% 0.17/0.51  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.17/0.51  % Total time : 0.008000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------