TSTP Solution File: NUN080+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUN080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:24:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.64s 2.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 39 ( 0 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 0 con; 1-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 11 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_59,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r1(X1)
| ~ id(X2,X3)
| ~ r2(X1,X4)
| ~ r2(X4,X5)
| ~ r3(X6,X5,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yty_jyl9/lgb.p',i_0_59) ).
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
r3(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1,esk6_2(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yty_jyl9/lgb.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_48,plain,
( id(X1,X2)
| ~ id(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yty_jyl9/lgb.p',i_0_48) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
id(esk12_1(X1),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yty_jyl9/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_23,plain,
( r2(X1,X2)
| ~ id(X2,esk10_1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yty_jyl9/lgb.p',i_0_23) ).
cnf(i_0_43,plain,
id(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yty_jyl9/lgb.p',i_0_43) ).
cnf(i_0_42,plain,
r1(esk16_1(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-yty_jyl9/lgb.p',i_0_42) ).
cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r1(X1)
| ~ id(X2,X3)
| ~ r2(X1,X4)
| ~ r2(X4,X5)
| ~ r3(X6,X5,X2) ),
i_0_59 ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
r3(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1,esk6_2(X1,X2)),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( id(X1,X2)
| ~ id(X2,X1) ),
i_0_48 ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
id(esk12_1(X1),X1),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( ~ r2(X1,X2)
| ~ r2(X3,X1)
| ~ r1(X3)
| ~ id(esk6_2(X2,X4),X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
id(X1,esk12_1(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]) ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( r2(X1,X2)
| ~ id(X2,esk10_1(X1)) ),
i_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
id(X1,X1),
i_0_43 ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
( ~ r2(X1,X2)
| ~ r2(X3,X1)
| ~ r1(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]) ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
r2(X1,esk10_1(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]) ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
( ~ r2(X1,X2)
| ~ r1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]) ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
r1(esk16_1(X1)),
i_0_42 ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
~ r1(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_76]) ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUN080+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 06:12:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.64/2.31 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.64/2.31 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.64/2.31 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.64/2.31 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C12_11_nc_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S065A
% 7.64/2.31 # and selection function SelectComplexAHP.
% 7.64/2.31 #
% 7.64/2.31 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 7.64/2.31 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.64/2.31
% 7.64/2.31 # Proof found!
% 7.64/2.31 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.64/2.31 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.64/2.31 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.64/2.31
% 7.64/2.31 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.64/2.31 # User time : 0.017 s
% 7.64/2.31 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.64/2.31 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 7.64/2.31 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.64/2.31
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------