TSTP Solution File: NUN073+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : NUN073+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:38:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.82s 3.02s
% Output   : Refutation 2.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : NUN073+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 07:30:36 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.38  The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.38  Thu Jun  2 07:30:36 2022
% 0.14/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 27902.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.14/0.38  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.14/0.38  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.38  40 back subsumes 35.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.46/0.72  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.46/0.72  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.46/0.72  number of clauses in intial UL: 38
% 0.46/0.72  number of clauses initially in problem: 66
% 0.46/0.72  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 57
% 0.46/0.72  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 30
% 0.46/0.72  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.46/0.72  absolute distinct symbol count: 30
% 0.46/0.72     distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.46/0.72     distinct function count: 19
% 0.46/0.72     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.72  
% 0.46/0.72  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.82/3.02  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.82/3.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 2 [ 1 1 457 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 3 [ 1 0 374 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 4 [ 1 1 503 ] (0.00 seconds, 925 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 5 [ 1 1 3189 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 6 [ 1 0 1132 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 7 [ 1 0 1204 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 8 [ 2 1 2155 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 9 [ 3 1 2603 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 10 [ 7 0 1146 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 11 [ 15 1 1108 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 12 [ 15 0 469 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 13 [ 16 1 1339 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 14 [ 16 1 264 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 15 [ 17 1 846 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 16 [ 11 1 745 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 17 [ 13 0 4080 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 18 [ 15 1 308 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   2.61 sec ----> 125 [hyper,87,20,62,112] {-} $F.
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.82/3.02  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.82/3.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  1 [] {+} id(A,$c1)| -r1(A).
% 2.82/3.02  13 [] {+} -id(A,B)| -id(C,D)| -r2(A,C)|r2(B,D).
% 2.82/3.02  19 [] {+} -id(A,B)| -r2(C,A)| -r2(D,B)|id(C,D).
% 2.82/3.02  20 [] {+} -id(A,B)| -r1(A)| -r2(C,B).
% 2.82/3.02  40 [] {-} id(A,A).
% 2.82/3.02  62 [] {+} r1($c2).
% 2.82/3.02  63 [] {+} r2($c2,$c3).
% 2.82/3.02  64 [] {+} id($c3,$c6).
% 2.82/3.02  65 [] {+} r1($c4).
% 2.82/3.02  66 [] {+} r2($c4,$c5).
% 2.82/3.02  67 [] {+} r2($c5,$c6).
% 2.82/3.02  73 [hyper,65,1] {+} id($c4,$c1).
% 2.82/3.02  87 [hyper,67,19,64,63] {+} id($c2,$c5).
% 2.82/3.02  112 [hyper,73,13,40,66] {-} r2($c1,$c5).
% 2.82/3.02  125 [hyper,87,20,62,112] {-} $F.
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.82/3.02  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  ============ end of search ============
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  true clauses given           2      (9.1%)
% 2.82/3.02  false clauses given         20
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.82/3.02     3  1         9
% 2.82/3.02     4  4         8
% 2.82/3.02     5  4         4
% 2.82/3.02     6  6         1
% 2.82/3.02     7  4         0
% 2.82/3.02     8  15        0
% 2.82/3.02     9  4         0
% 2.82/3.02    14  3         0
% 2.82/3.02  tot:  41        22      (34.9% true)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Model 18 [ 15 1 308 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.82/3.02  
% 2.82/3.02  Process 27902 finished Thu Jun  2 07:30:38 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------