TSTP Solution File: NUN073+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUN073+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:53:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.97s 2.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   33
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (   8 unt;  30 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  25   ~;  19   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   40 (  24   >;  16   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   25 (  25 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (;  22   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ r4 > r3 > r2 > id > r1 > #nlpp > #skF_11 > #skF_16 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_18 > #skF_19 > #skF_25 > #skF_3 > #skF_15 > #skF_12 > #skF_10 > #skF_1 > #skF_8 > #skF_21 > #skF_13 > #skF_17 > #skF_22 > #skF_14 > #skF_24 > #skF_23 > #skF_7 > #skF_9 > #skF_5 > #skF_4 > #skF_20

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_25',type,
    '#skF_25': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r2,type,
    r2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r3,type,
    r3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(id,type,
    id: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': $i ).

tff(r4,type,
    r4: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_22',type,
    '#skF_22': $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_24',type,
    '#skF_24': $i ).

tff('#skF_23',type,
    '#skF_23': $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(r1,type,
    r1: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': $i > $i ).

tff(f_287,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [Y1] :
        ( ! [Y2] :
            ( ! [Y4] :
                ( ~ r1(Y4)
                | ~ r2(Y4,Y2) )
            | ~ id(Y2,Y1) )
        | ! [Y3] :
            ( ! [Y5] :
                ( ~ r1(Y5)
                | ~ r2(Y5,Y3) )
            | ~ r2(Y3,Y1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',oneunidtwo) ).

tff(f_223,axiom,
    ! [X3,X10] :
      ( ! [Y12] :
          ( ! [Y13] :
              ( ~ id(Y13,Y12)
              | ~ r2(X3,Y13) )
          | ~ r2(X10,Y12) )
      | id(X3,X10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_3a) ).

tff(f_262,axiom,
    ! [X7,Y10] :
      ( ! [Y20] :
          ( ~ id(Y20,Y10)
          | ~ r1(Y20) )
      | ~ r2(X7,Y10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM009+0.ax',axiom_7a) ).

tff(c_128,plain,
    r1('#skF_23'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_287]) ).

tff(c_124,plain,
    id('#skF_22','#skF_21'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_287]) ).

tff(c_126,plain,
    r2('#skF_23','#skF_22'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_287]) ).

tff(c_118,plain,
    r2('#skF_24','#skF_21'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_287]) ).

tff(c_1735,plain,
    ! [X3_256,X10_257,Y12_258,Y13_259] :
      ( id(X3_256,X10_257)
      | ~ r2(X10_257,Y12_258)
      | ~ r2(X3_256,Y13_259)
      | ~ id(Y13_259,Y12_258) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_223]) ).

tff(c_2338,plain,
    ! [X3_296,Y13_297] :
      ( id(X3_296,'#skF_24')
      | ~ r2(X3_296,Y13_297)
      | ~ id(Y13_297,'#skF_21') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_1735]) ).

tff(c_2377,plain,
    ( id('#skF_23','#skF_24')
    | ~ id('#skF_22','#skF_21') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_126,c_2338]) ).

tff(c_2394,plain,
    id('#skF_23','#skF_24'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_124,c_2377]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    r2('#skF_25','#skF_24'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_287]) ).

tff(c_452,plain,
    ! [X7_171,Y10_172,Y20_173] :
      ( ~ r2(X7_171,Y10_172)
      | ~ r1(Y20_173)
      | ~ id(Y20_173,Y10_172) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_262]) ).

tff(c_478,plain,
    ! [Y20_173] :
      ( ~ r1(Y20_173)
      | ~ id(Y20_173,'#skF_24') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_120,c_452]) ).

tff(c_2401,plain,
    ~ r1('#skF_23'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2394,c_478]) ).

tff(c_2415,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_128,c_2401]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : NUN073+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:37:37 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.97/2.39  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.97/2.40  
% 5.97/2.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.03/2.43  
% 6.03/2.43  Inference rules
% 6.03/2.43  ----------------------
% 6.03/2.43  #Ref     : 0
% 6.03/2.43  #Sup     : 522
% 6.03/2.43  #Fact    : 0
% 6.03/2.43  #Define  : 0
% 6.03/2.43  #Split   : 10
% 6.03/2.43  #Chain   : 0
% 6.03/2.43  #Close   : 0
% 6.03/2.43  
% 6.03/2.43  Ordering : KBO
% 6.03/2.43  
% 6.03/2.43  Simplification rules
% 6.03/2.43  ----------------------
% 6.03/2.43  #Subsume      : 133
% 6.03/2.43  #Demod        : 104
% 6.03/2.43  #Tautology    : 98
% 6.03/2.43  #SimpNegUnit  : 29
% 6.03/2.43  #BackRed      : 1
% 6.03/2.43  
% 6.03/2.43  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.03/2.43  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 6.03/2.43  
% 6.03/2.43  Timing (in seconds)
% 6.03/2.43  ----------------------
% 6.03/2.43  Preprocessing        : 0.56
% 6.03/2.43  Parsing              : 0.29
% 6.03/2.43  CNF conversion       : 0.06
% 6.03/2.43  Main loop            : 0.78
% 6.03/2.43  Inferencing          : 0.29
% 6.03/2.43  Reduction            : 0.22
% 6.03/2.43  Demodulation         : 0.16
% 6.03/2.43  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 6.03/2.43  Subsumption          : 0.16
% 6.03/2.43  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 6.03/2.43  MUC search           : 0.00
% 6.03/2.43  Cooper               : 0.00
% 6.03/2.43  Total                : 1.38
% 6.03/2.43  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 6.03/2.43  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 6.03/2.43  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 6.03/2.43  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------