TSTP Solution File: NUM925_3 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUM925_3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:15:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.67s 1.83s
% Output   : Refutation 1.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  134 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   5   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :  110 ( 110 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    0 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   22 (  20 usr;   9 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn  13   !;   0   ?;  13   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(1,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,zero_zero_int),plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_n1pos) ).

tff(33,axiom,
    one_one_int = number_number_of_int(bit1(pls)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_25_semiring__norm_I110_J) ).

tff(75,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: int] : ( plus_plus_int(X,Y) = plus_plus_int(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_67_zadd__commute) ).

tff(123,axiom,
    pls = zero_zero_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_98_Pls__def) ).

tff(233,axiom,
    ! [X: int] : ( number_number_of_int(X) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_177_number__of__is__id) ).

tff(289,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: nat] :
      ( ( X = zero_zero_int )
      | ( hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(X),Y) != zero_zero_int ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_231_field__power__not__zero) ).

tff(290,plain,
    ! [X: int,Y: nat] :
      ( ( X = pls )
      | ( hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(X),Y) != pls ) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[289,123,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(796,axiom,
    ! [X: int,Y: int] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,X),Y))
      | ( X != Y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_718_zless__le) ).

tff(892,axiom,
    ! [X: int] : ( nat_1(number_number_of_int(X)) = number_number_of_nat(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_766_nat__number__of) ).

tff(893,plain,
    ! [X: int] : ( nat_1(X) = number_number_of_nat(X) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[892,233,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(989,axiom,
    ! [X: int] : ( succ(X) = plus_plus_int(X,one_one_int) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_814_succ__def) ).

tff(1599,negated_conjecture,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),number_number_of_nat(bit0(bit1(pls)))) = zero_zero_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

tff(1600,plain,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),nat_1(bit0(bit1(pls)))) = pls,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1599,123,893,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1888,plain,
    one_one_int = bit1(pls),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[33,233,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1939,plain,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),nat_1(bit0(one_one_int))) = pls,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1600,1888,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1973,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,pls),plus_plus_int(one_one_int,hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1,123,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1986,plain,
    ! [X: int] : ( succ(X) = plus_plus_int(one_one_int,X) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[989,75,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1991,plain,
    hAPP_nat_int(power_power_int(succ(hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n))),nat_1(bit0(one_one_int))) = pls,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1939,1986,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(1993,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP_int_bool(hAPP_i1948725293t_bool(ord_less_int,pls),succ(hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1973,1986,theory(equality)]) ).

tff(2198,plain,
    pls != succ(hAPP_nat_int(semiri1621563631at_int,n)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[796,1993]) ).

cnf(3036,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[290,1991]),2198]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : NUM925_3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 20:59:50 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.50  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.52  * 
% 0.23/0.52  * 
% 0.23/0.52  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.23/0.52  * 
% 0.23/0.52  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.23/0.52  * 
% 0.23/0.52  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.23/0.52   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.23/0.52   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.23/0.52   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.23/0.52   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.23/0.52   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.23/0.52   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.23/0.52   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.23/0.52   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.23/0.52   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.23/0.52   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.23/0.52   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.23/0.52   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.23/0.52  * 
% 0.23/0.52  "."
% 0.23/0.52  * 
% 0.23/0.52  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-07T20:59:50
% 0.23/0.52  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n015.cluster.edu at 2022-07-07T20:59:50
% 1.67/1.83  
% 1.67/1.83  
% 1.67/1.83  #||
% 1.67/1.83  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.67/1.83  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.67/1.83  ||#
% 1.67/1.83  
% 1.67/1.83  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.67/1.83  ;     10502 formulas have been input or derived (from 290 formulas).
% 1.67/1.83  ;      3036 (29%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.67/1.83  ;          976 (32%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.67/1.83  ;         2060 (68%) are still being kept.
% 1.67/1.83  ; 
% 1.67/1.83  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.265  20%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.028   2%   Assert                       (1,205 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.206  16%   Process new row              (8,831 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.209  16%   Resolution                   (578 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.031   2%   Paramodulation               (289 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (9 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.018   1%   Condensing                   (1,937 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.110   8%   Forward subsumption          (1,937 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.051   4%   Backward subsumption         (1,407 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.015   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (2,817 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.172  13%   Forward simplification       (8,828 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.047   4%   Backward simplification      (2,610 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.077   6%   Ordering                     (17,349 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.013   1%   Sortal reasoning             (19,041 calls)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.67/1.83  ;     0.061   5%   Other
% 1.67/1.83  ;     1.304        Total
% 1.67/1.83  ;     1.306        Real time
% 1.67/1.83  ; 
% 1.67/1.83  ; Term-hash-array has 6,206 terms in all.
% 1.67/1.83  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,055 entries (1,055 at peak, 1,407 added, 352 deleted).
% 1.67/1.83  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 10,202 nodes (10,202 at peak, 13,870 added, 3,668 deleted).
% 1.67/1.83  ;  Retrieved 2,864 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,937 calls.
% 1.67/1.83  ;  Retrieved 783 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,407 calls.
% 1.67/1.83  ; Path-index has 5,183 entries (5,183 at peak, 6,546 added, 1,363 deleted).
% 1.67/1.83  ; Path-index has 13,687 nodes (13,687 at peak, 15,508 added, 1,821 deleted).
% 1.67/1.83  ; Trie-index has 5,183 entries (5,183 at peak, 6,546 added, 1,363 deleted).
% 1.67/1.83  ; Trie-index has 17,830 nodes (17,830 at peak, 24,198 added, 6,368 deleted).
% 1.67/1.83  ; Retrieved 29,506 generalization terms in 46,596 calls.
% 1.67/1.83  ; Retrieved 3,888 instance terms in 1,617 calls.
% 1.67/1.83  ; Retrieved 160,801 unifiable terms in 3,002 calls.
% 1.67/1.83  ; 
% 1.67/1.83  ; The agenda of rows to process has 42 entries:
% 1.67/1.83  ;     1 with value 13              1 with value 21               1 with value 29
% 1.67/1.83  ;     1 with value 14              9 with value 22               1 with value 30
% 1.67/1.83  ;     1 with value 15              4 with value 23               1 with value 31
% 1.67/1.83  ;     1 with value 19              4 with value 24               1 with value 32
% 1.67/1.83  ;    16 with value 20
% 1.67/1.83  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 751 entries:
% 1.67/1.83  ;    17 with value 17             15 with value 33               1 with value 49
% 1.67/1.83  ;    41 with value 18              6 with value 34              12 with value 50
% 1.67/1.83  ;    45 with value 19             34 with value 35               1 with value 52
% 1.67/1.83  ;    57 with value 20             16 with value 36               2 with value 53
% 1.67/1.83  ;    47 with value 21             11 with value 37               2 with value 55
% 1.67/1.83  ;    38 with value 22             12 with value 38               1 with value 58
% 1.67/1.83  ;    39 with value 23             15 with value 39               4 with value 60
% 1.67/1.83  ;    21 with value 24              2 with value 40               2 with value 65
% 1.67/1.83  ;    27 with value 25              4 with value 41               2 with value 67
% 1.67/1.83  ;    24 with value 26              3 with value 42               2 with value 68
% 1.67/1.83  ;    38 with value 27              9 with value 43               3 with value 70
% 1.67/1.83  ;    16 with value 28             14 with value 44               3 with value 73
% 1.67/1.83  ;    30 with value 29              5 with value 45               1 with value 74
% 1.67/1.83  ;    35 with value 30              4 with value 46               4 with value 82
% 1.67/1.83  ;    16 with value 31              1 with value 47               4 with value 83
% 1.67/1.83  ;    60 with value 32              5 with value 48
% 1.67/1.83  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1022 entries:
% 1.67/1.83  ;     4 with value (4 5)          41 with value (4 16)          21 with value (4 26)
% 1.67/1.83  ;    11 with value (4 7)          47 with value (4 17)          32 with value (4 27)
% 1.67/1.83  ;    12 with value (4 8)          82 with value (4 18)          43 with value (4 28)
% 1.67/1.83  ;    13 with value (4 9)          67 with value (4 19)           2 with value (4 29)
% 1.67/1.83  ;    26 with value (4 10)        207 with value (4 20)          18 with value (4 30)
% 1.67/1.83  ;    24 with value (4 11)         59 with value (4 21)          16 with value (4 31)
% 1.67/1.83  ;    24 with value (4 12)         40 with value (4 22)           3 with value (4 32)
% 1.67/1.83  ;    40 with value (4 13)         30 with value (4 23)           4 with value (4 33)
% 1.67/1.83  ;    27 with value (4 14)         35 with value (4 24)           4 with value (4 34)
% 1.67/1.83  ;    56 with value (4 15)         33 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 36)
% 1.67/1.83  Evaluation took:
% 1.67/1.83    1.308 seconds of real time
% 1.67/1.83    1.190711 seconds of user run time
% 1.67/1.83    0.116541 seconds of system run time
% 1.67/1.83    [Run times include 0.115 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.67/1.83    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.67/1.83    0 page faults and
% 1.67/1.83    97,234,296 bytes consed.
% 1.67/1.83  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.67/1.83  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-07T20:59:51
% 1.67/1.83  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.67/1.83  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------