TSTP Solution File: NUM925+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUM925+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:41:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 13.29s 3.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (  14 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_133,plain,
    ( X1 = zero_zero_int
    | power_power_int(X1,number_number_of_nat(X2)) != zero_zero_int ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qyor73x1/lgb.p',i_0_133) ).

cnf(i_0_117,plain,
    pls = zero_zero_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qyor73x1/lgb.p',i_0_117) ).

cnf(i_0_152,negated_conjecture,
    power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,semiri1621563631at_int(n)),number_number_of_nat(plus_plus_int(plus_plus_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,pls),pls),plus_plus_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,pls),pls)))) = zero_zero_int,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qyor73x1/lgb.p',i_0_152) ).

cnf(i_0_119,plain,
    plus_plus_int(X1,pls) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qyor73x1/lgb.p',i_0_119) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ord_less_int(zero_zero_int,plus_plus_int(one_one_int,semiri1621563631at_int(n))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qyor73x1/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_47,plain,
    ~ ord_less_int(pls,pls),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qyor73x1/lgb.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(c_0_159,plain,
    ( X1 = zero_zero_int
    | power_power_int(X1,number_number_of_nat(X2)) != zero_zero_int ),
    i_0_133 ).

cnf(c_0_160,plain,
    pls = zero_zero_int,
    i_0_117 ).

cnf(c_0_161,negated_conjecture,
    power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,semiri1621563631at_int(n)),number_number_of_nat(plus_plus_int(plus_plus_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,pls),pls),plus_plus_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,pls),pls)))) = zero_zero_int,
    i_0_152 ).

cnf(c_0_162,plain,
    plus_plus_int(X1,pls) = X1,
    i_0_119 ).

cnf(c_0_163,plain,
    ord_less_int(zero_zero_int,plus_plus_int(one_one_int,semiri1621563631at_int(n))),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_164,plain,
    ( X1 = pls
    | power_power_int(X1,number_number_of_nat(X2)) != pls ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_159,c_0_160]),c_0_160]) ).

cnf(c_0_165,negated_conjecture,
    power_power_int(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,semiri1621563631at_int(n)),number_number_of_nat(plus_plus_int(one_one_int,one_one_int))) = pls,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_161,c_0_162]),c_0_162]),c_0_162]),c_0_162]),c_0_160]) ).

cnf(c_0_166,plain,
    ord_less_int(pls,plus_plus_int(one_one_int,semiri1621563631at_int(n))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_163,c_0_160]) ).

cnf(c_0_167,negated_conjecture,
    plus_plus_int(one_one_int,semiri1621563631at_int(n)) = pls,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_164,c_0_165]) ).

cnf(c_0_168,plain,
    ~ ord_less_int(pls,pls),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_169,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_166,c_0_167]),c_0_168]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.11  % Problem  : NUM925+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.05/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 06:57:44 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.42  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 13.29/3.38  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 13.29/3.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 13.29/3.38  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 13.29/3.38  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 13.29/3.38  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 13.29/3.38  #
% 13.29/3.38  # Preprocessing time       : 0.021 s
% 13.29/3.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.29/3.38  
% 13.29/3.38  # Proof found!
% 13.29/3.38  # SZS status Theorem
% 13.29/3.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.29/3.38  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.29/3.38  
% 13.29/3.38  # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.29/3.38  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 13.29/3.38  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 13.29/3.38  # Total time               : 0.030 s
% 13.29/3.38  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 13.29/3.38  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------