TSTP Solution File: NUM920_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM920_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:53:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.01s 1.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   2 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   12 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   4   ~;   2   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   28 (   9 atm;   3 fun;   6 num;  10 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   0 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (;   7   !;   3   ?;  10   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:

tff(f_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ? [Ua: $int] :
          ( $less(0,Ua)
          & ! [Va: $int] :
              ( $less(Va,Ua)
             => $less($sum(Va,1),Ua) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

tff(f_232,plain,
    ! [Va: $int] :
    ? [Ua: $int] :
      ( $less(0,Ua)
      & ! [Va: $int] :
          ( ~ $less(Va,Ua)
          | $less($sum(Va,1),Ua) ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(f_235,plain,
    ! [Va: $int,Ua: $int] :
      ( ! [Va: $int] :
        ? [Ua: $int] :
          ( $less(0,Ua)
          & ! [Va: $int] :
              ( ~ $less(Va,Ua)
              | $less($sum(Va,1),Ua) ) )
    <=> $false ),
    inference(theorem,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],]) ).

tff(f_236,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equivalence,[status(thm)],[f_232,f_235]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_236]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : NUM920_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:55:30 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.01/1.49  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.01/1.49  
% 2.01/1.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.43/1.53  
% 2.43/1.53  Inference rules
% 2.43/1.53  ----------------------
% 2.43/1.53  #Ref     : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #Sup     : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #Fact    : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #Define  : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #Split   : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #Chain   : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #Close   : 0
% 2.43/1.53  
% 2.43/1.53  Ordering : LPO
% 2.43/1.53  
% 2.43/1.53  Simplification rules
% 2.43/1.53  ----------------------
% 2.43/1.53  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #Demod        : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.43/1.53  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.43/1.53  
% 2.43/1.53  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.43/1.53  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.43/1.53  
% 2.43/1.53  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.43/1.53  ----------------------
% 2.43/1.53  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 2.43/1.53  Parsing              : 0.24
% 2.43/1.53  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.43/1.53  Main loop            : 0.03
% 2.43/1.54  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54  Reduction            : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54  Demodulation         : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54  BG Simplification    : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 2.43/1.54  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54  Cooper               : 0.04
% 2.43/1.54  Total                : 0.52
% 2.43/1.54  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.43/1.54  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------