TSTP Solution File: NUM909_1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : NUM909_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:53:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 2.52s 1.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 3 unt; 2 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 5 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 6 ( 0 atm; 2 fun; 2 num; 2 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 2 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 (; 2 !; 0 ?; 2 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
tff('#skF_2',type,
'#skF_2': $real ).
tff('#skF_1',type,
'#skF_1': $real ).
%Foreground operators:
tff(f_32,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [Xa: $real,Ya: $real] :
( ( $difference(Xa,Ya) = 0 )
=> ( Xa = Ya ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',real_difference_problem_13) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
$difference('#skF_1','#skF_2') = 0,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).
tff(c_1,plain,
'#skF_2' != '#skF_1',
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).
tff(c_3,plain,
$false,
inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LFA')],[c_2,c_1]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : NUM909_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 14:49:07 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 2.52/1.66 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.52/1.66
% 2.52/1.66 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.72/1.73
% 2.72/1.73 Inference rules
% 2.72/1.73 ----------------------
% 2.72/1.73 #Ref : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #Sup : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #Fact : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #Define : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #Split : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #Chain : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #Close : 1
% 2.72/1.73
% 2.72/1.73 Ordering : LPO
% 2.72/1.73
% 2.72/1.73 Simplification rules
% 2.72/1.73 ----------------------
% 2.72/1.73 #Subsume : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #Demod : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #Tautology : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.72/1.73 #BackRed : 0
% 2.72/1.73
% 2.72/1.73 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.72/1.73 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.72/1.73
% 2.72/1.73 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.72/1.73 ----------------------
% 2.72/1.73 Preprocessing : 0.50
% 2.72/1.73 Parsing : 0.24
% 2.72/1.73 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.72/1.73 Main loop : 0.10
% 2.72/1.73 Inferencing : 0.00
% 2.72/1.73 Reduction : 0.02
% 2.72/1.73 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.72/1.73 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.72/1.73 Subsumption : 0.01
% 2.72/1.73 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.72/1.73 MUC search : 0.02
% 2.72/1.73 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.72/1.73 Total : 0.70
% 2.72/1.73 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.72/1.73 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.72/1.73 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.72/1.73 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------