TSTP Solution File: NUM905_1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM905_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:53:02 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.60s 1.87s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  10 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (  10   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :   26 (   0 atm;  10 fun;  15 num;   1 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   2 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    1 (;   1   !;   0   ?;   1   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ #nlpp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:
tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $rat ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $rat ).

%Foreground operators:

tff(f_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [Xa: $rat] :
        ( ( Xa = $uminus(Xa) )
      <=> ( Xa = 0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_uminus_problem_9) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ( ( $uminus('#skF_2') = '#skF_2' )
    | ( '#skF_1' = 0 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    '#skF_1' = 0,
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_4]) ).

tff(c_3,plain,
    ( ( $uminus('#skF_2') = '#skF_2' )
    | ( $uminus('#skF_1') != '#skF_1' ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_7,plain,
    ( ( $uminus('#skF_2') = '#skF_2' )
    | ( $uminus(0) != 0 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_6,c_3]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    $uminus('#skF_2') = '#skF_2',
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRA')],[c_7]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ( ( '#skF_2' != 0 )
    | ( '#skF_1' = 0 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_5,plain,
    '#skF_2' != 0,
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_2]) ).

tff(c_9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LRA')],[c_8,c_5]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    $uminus('#skF_2') = '#skF_2',
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_4]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LRA')],[c_10,c_5]) ).

tff(c_13,plain,
    '#skF_1' = 0,
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_2]) ).

tff(c_1,plain,
    ( ( '#skF_2' != 0 )
    | ( $uminus('#skF_1') != '#skF_1' ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_15,plain,
    ( ( '#skF_2' != 0 )
    | ( $uminus(0) != 0 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_13,c_13,c_1]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    '#skF_2' != 0,
    inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRA')],[c_15]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    '#skF_2' = 0,
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_2]) ).

tff(c_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_14]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM905_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:24:08 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.60/1.87  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.60/1.87  
% 2.60/1.87  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.73/1.89  
% 2.73/1.89  Inference rules
% 2.73/1.89  ----------------------
% 2.73/1.89  #Ref     : 0
% 2.73/1.89  #Sup     : 0
% 2.73/1.89  #Fact    : 0
% 2.73/1.89  #Define  : 0
% 2.73/1.89  #Split   : 2
% 2.73/1.89  #Chain   : 0
% 2.73/1.89  #Close   : 2
% 2.73/1.89  
% 2.73/1.89  Ordering : LPO
% 2.73/1.89  
% 2.73/1.89  Simplification rules
% 2.73/1.89  ----------------------
% 2.73/1.89  #Subsume      : 1
% 2.73/1.89  #Demod        : 4
% 2.73/1.89  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.73/1.89  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 2.73/1.89  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.73/1.89  
% 2.73/1.89  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.73/1.89  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.73/1.89  
% 2.73/1.89  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.73/1.89  ----------------------
% 2.73/1.90  Preprocessing        : 0.40
% 2.73/1.90  Parsing              : 0.24
% 2.73/1.90  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.73/1.90  Main loop            : 0.37
% 2.73/1.90  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 2.73/1.90  Reduction            : 0.02
% 2.73/1.90  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 2.73/1.90  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.73/1.90  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 2.73/1.90  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.73/1.90  MUC search           : 0.01
% 2.73/1.90  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.73/1.90  Total                : 0.82
% 2.73/1.90  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.73/1.90  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.73/1.90  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.73/1.90  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------