TSTP Solution File: NUM904_1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : NUM904_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:51:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.77s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUM904_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:10:20 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running TFA theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --no_cores 8 --schedule casc_29_tfa --heuristic_context casc_unsat /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.77/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.77/1.16 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.77/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 ------ Parsing...
% 0.77/1.16 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 tff(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.77/1.16 ! [X0 : $rat] : $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) = 0/1),
% 0.77/1.16 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rat_uminus_problem_8)).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.77/1.16 ~! [X0 : $rat] : $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) = 0/1),
% 0.77/1.16 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 tff(f7,plain,(
% 0.77/1.16 ( ! [X0 : $rat] : ($sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) = 0/1) )),
% 0.77/1.16 introduced(theory_axiom_143,[])).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 tff(f14,plain,(
% 0.77/1.16 ? [X0 : $rat] : $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) != 0/1),
% 0.77/1.16 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2])).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 tff(f15,plain,(
% 0.77/1.16 ? [X0 : $rat] : $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) != 0/1 => 0/1 != $sum(sK0,$uminus(sK0))),
% 0.77/1.16 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 tff(f16,plain,(
% 0.77/1.16 0/1 != $sum(sK0,$uminus(sK0))),
% 0.77/1.16 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f14,f15])).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 tff(f17,plain,(
% 0.77/1.16 0/1 != $sum(sK0,$uminus(sK0))),
% 0.77/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16])).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 cnf(c_55,plain,
% 0.77/1.16 ($sum_rat(X0_4,$uminus_rat(X0_4)) = 0/1),
% 0.77/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
% 0.77/1.16 ($sum_rat(sK0,$uminus_rat(sK0)) != 0/1),
% 0.77/1.16 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17])).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 cnf(c_78,plain,
% 0.77/1.16 ($false),
% 0.77/1.16 inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_55])).
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/1.16
% 0.77/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------