TSTP Solution File: NUM891_1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : NUM891_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:02:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.59s
% Output   : Refutation 1.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (   4 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  128 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  141 (  62   ~;  67   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  131 (  35 atm;  30 fun;  41 num;  25 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr;   1 ari)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   4 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   1 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (  22   !;   3   ?;  25   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: $int ).

tff(f237,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f29,f30,f33,f128,f155,f181,f236]) ).

tff(f236,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f235]) ).

tff(f235,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f230,f126]) ).

tff(f126,plain,
    ( $less(0,sK0)
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f125]) ).

tff(f125,plain,
    ( spl1_4
  <=> $less(0,sK0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_4])]) ).

tff(f230,plain,
    ( ~ $less(0,sK0)
    | ~ spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f166,f123]) ).

tff(f123,plain,
    ( $less(sK0,0)
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f121]) ).

tff(f121,plain,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> $less(sK0,0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])]) ).

tff(f166,plain,
    ( ! [X4: $int] :
        ( ~ $less(sK0,X4)
        | ~ $less(X4,sK0) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f158]) ).

tff(f158,plain,
    ( ! [X4: $int] :
        ( ~ $less(X4,sK0)
        | ~ $less(sK0,X4)
        | $less(0,0) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f47,f39]) ).

tff(f39,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $int] :
        ( $less(0,$sum(X2,sK0))
        | ~ $less(sK0,X2) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f11,f34]) ).

tff(f34,plain,
    ( ( 0 = $sum(sK0,sK0) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f7,f24]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ( ( sK0 = $uminus(sK0) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f22]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> ( sK0 = $uminus(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( 0 = $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_145,[]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( $less($sum(X0,X2),$sum(X1,X2))
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_150,[]) ).

tff(f47,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
        ( ~ $less(X1,$sum(X0,sK0))
        | ~ $less(X0,sK0)
        | $less(X1,0) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f38,f9]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ! [X2: $int,X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( ~ $less(X1,X2)
      | $less(X0,X2)
      | ~ $less(X0,X1) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_148,[]) ).

tff(f38,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $int] :
        ( $less($sum(X1,sK0),0)
        | ~ $less(X1,sK0) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f11,f34]) ).

tff(f181,plain,
    ( spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f85,f22,f121,f125]) ).

tff(f85,plain,
    ( ~ $less(sK0,0)
    | $less(0,sK0)
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f54,f5]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ! [X0: $int] : ( $sum(X0,0) = X0 ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_142,[]) ).

tff(f54,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $int] :
        ( $less(0,$sum(sK0,X0))
        | ~ $less(sK0,X0) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f39,f3]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] : ( $sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_140,[]) ).

tff(f155,plain,
    ( spl1_3
    | spl1_2
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f140,f125,f26,f121]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> ( 0 = sK0 ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).

tff(f140,plain,
    ( $less(sK0,0)
    | spl1_2
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f139,f27]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ( ( 0 != sK0 )
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f26]) ).

tff(f139,plain,
    ( $less(sK0,0)
    | ( 0 = sK0 )
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f127,f10]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: $int,X1: $int] :
      ( $less(X1,X0)
      | $less(X0,X1)
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    introduced(theory_axiom_149,[]) ).

tff(f127,plain,
    ( ~ $less(0,sK0)
    | spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f125]) ).

tff(f128,plain,
    ( spl1_3
    | ~ spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f75,f22,f125,f121]) ).

tff(f75,plain,
    ( ~ $less(0,sK0)
    | $less(sK0,0)
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f49,f5]) ).

tff(f49,plain,
    ( ! [X1: $int] :
        ( $less($sum(sK0,X1),0)
        | ~ $less(X1,sK0) )
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f38,f3]) ).

tff(f33,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f32]) ).

tff(f32,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(evaluation,[],[f31]) ).

tff(f31,plain,
    ( ( 0 != $uminus(0) )
    | spl1_1
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f23,f28]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ( ( 0 = sK0 )
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f26]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ( ( sK0 != $uminus(sK0) )
    | spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f22]) ).

tff(f30,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_2
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f20,f22,f26]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ( ( sK0 != $uminus(sK0) )
    | ( 0 != sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 != $uminus(sK0) )
      | ( 0 != sK0 ) )
    & ( ( sK0 = $uminus(sK0) )
      | ( 0 = sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f16,f17]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $int] :
        ( ( ( $uminus(X0) != X0 )
          | ( 0 != X0 ) )
        & ( ( $uminus(X0) = X0 )
          | ( 0 = X0 ) ) )
   => ( ( ( sK0 != $uminus(sK0) )
        | ( 0 != sK0 ) )
      & ( ( sK0 = $uminus(sK0) )
        | ( 0 = sK0 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ? [X0: $int] :
      ( ( ( $uminus(X0) != X0 )
        | ( 0 != X0 ) )
      & ( ( $uminus(X0) = X0 )
        | ( 0 = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ? [X0: $int] :
      ( ( 0 = X0 )
    <~> ( $uminus(X0) = X0 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: $int] :
        ( ( $uminus(X0) = X0 )
      <=> ( 0 = X0 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: $int] :
      ( ( $uminus(X0) = X0 )
    <=> ( 0 = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',uminus_equal) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f26,f22]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ( ( 0 = sK0 )
    | ( sK0 = $uminus(sK0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : NUM891=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 09:15:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.55  % (20445)dis+2_1:1_av=off:bsr=on:erd=off:s2pl=on:sgt=16:sos=on:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=46:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 0.19/0.55  % (20425)dis+1011_1:64_drc=off:flr=on:nwc=2.0:sac=on:urr=ec_only:i=8:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/8Mi)
% 0.19/0.55  % (20446)dis+32_1:1_bd=off:nm=4:sos=on:ss=included:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.19/0.56  % (20425)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.56  % (20425)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.56  % (20425)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)dis+20_1:12_aac=none:acc=model:awrs=converge:fd=preordered:fsr=off:nicw=on:nwc=3.0:s2a=on:s2agt=16:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.56  % (20437)lrs+22_1:1_amm=sco:fsr=off:gve=force:sos=on:uwa=all:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.19/0.56  % (20430)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fd=off:fde=none:ins=3:sac=on:sos=on:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=36:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/36Mi)
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.56  
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.56  % (20438)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.58  % (20425)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.58  % (20425)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.19/0.58  % (20425)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  % (20425)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.58  % (20425)Time elapsed: 0.131 s
% 0.19/0.58  % (20425)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.19/0.58  % (20425)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.58  % (20425)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.59  % (20430)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.59  % (20424)lrs+1010_1:1_aac=none:bce=on:nicw=on:nm=0:plsq=on:plsql=on:sac=on:sos=on:sp=frequency:spb=units:to=lpo:i=34:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/34Mi)
% 0.19/0.59  % (20429)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=32:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/32Mi)
% 0.19/0.59  % (20430)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.78/0.59  % (20430)------------------------------
% 1.78/0.59  % (20430)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.78/0.59  % (20430)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.78/0.59  % (20430)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.78/0.59  
% 1.78/0.59  % (20430)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.78/0.59  % (20430)Time elapsed: 0.094 s
% 1.78/0.59  % (20430)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 1.78/0.59  % (20430)------------------------------
% 1.78/0.59  % (20430)------------------------------
% 1.78/0.59  % (20422)Success in time 0.238 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------