TSTP Solution File: NUM876_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : NUM876_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:07:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 9 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 8 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 33 ( 0 atm; 16 fun; 11 num; 6 var)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 1 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 4 !; 2 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_5,type,
sK0: $int ).
tff(f22,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
0 != 0,
inference(superposition,[],[f19,f8]) ).
tff(f8,plain,
! [X0: $int] : ( 0 = $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) ),
introduced(theory_axiom_145,[]) ).
tff(f19,plain,
0 != $sum(sK0,$uminus(sK0)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
tff(f18,plain,
0 != $sum(sK0,$uminus(sK0)),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f16,f17]) ).
tff(f17,plain,
( ? [X0: $int] : ( 0 != $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) )
=> ( 0 != $sum(sK0,$uminus(sK0)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
tff(f16,plain,
? [X0: $int] : ( 0 != $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tff(f3,plain,
~ ! [X0: $int] : ( 0 = $sum(X0,$uminus(X0)) ),
inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).
tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0: $int] : ( $difference(X0,X0) = 0 ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,conjecture,
! [X0: $int] : ( $difference(X0,X0) = 0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x_minus_x_equals_0) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM876=1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 08:53:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 % (6192)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (6184)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/191324Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)Time elapsed: 0.087 s
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (6192)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (6183)Success in time 0.146 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------