TSTP Solution File: NUM843+2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : NUM843+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:46:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.61s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 45 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 13 ~; 17 |; 0 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 15 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f301,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f218,f300]) ).
fof(f300,plain,
spl4_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f299]) ).
fof(f299,plain,
( $false
| spl4_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f291,f119]) ).
fof(f119,plain,
~ leq(vd390,vd391),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
~ leq(vd390,vd391),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(conjunct2(243), 393, 0)') ).
fof(f291,plain,
( leq(vd390,vd391)
| spl4_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f241,f154]) ).
fof(f154,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ less(X1,X0)
| leq(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).
fof(f78,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( leq(X1,X0)
<=> ( X0 = X1
| less(X1,X0) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f22,axiom,
! [X36,X37] :
( leq(X37,X36)
<=> ( X36 = X37
| less(X37,X36) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 17), 1)') ).
fof(f241,plain,
( less(vd390,vd391)
| spl4_2 ),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f117,f205,f124]) ).
fof(f124,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( less(X0,X1)
| greater(X0,X1)
| X0 = X1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).
fof(f52,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( less(X0,X1)
| greater(X0,X1)
| X0 = X1 ),
inference(rectify,[],[f26]) ).
fof(f26,axiom,
! [X44,X45] :
( less(X44,X45)
| greater(X44,X45)
| X44 = X45 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)') ).
fof(f205,plain,
( vd390 != vd391
| spl4_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f204]) ).
fof(f204,plain,
( spl4_2
<=> vd390 = vd391 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).
fof(f117,plain,
~ greater(vd390,vd391),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
~ greater(vd390,vd391),
inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ greater(vd390,vd391),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
greater(vd390,vd391),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(244, 394, 0)') ).
fof(f218,plain,
~ spl4_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f217]) ).
fof(f217,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f215,f186]) ).
fof(f186,plain,
! [X1] : leq(X1,X1),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f155]) ).
fof(f155,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( X0 != X1
| leq(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).
fof(f215,plain,
( ~ leq(vd390,vd390)
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f119,f206]) ).
fof(f206,plain,
( vd390 = vd391
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f204]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM843+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 06:34:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a FOF_CAX_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2182)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2184)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2185)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2183)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2186)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2187)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2181"
% 0.61/0.78 % (2186)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (2186)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.78 % (2186)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2186)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.61/0.78
% 0.61/0.78 % (2186)Memory used [KB]: 1049
% 0.61/0.78 % (2186)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.78 % (2186)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2187)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (2187)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.78 % (2187)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2187)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.61/0.78 % (2186)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.78 % (2186)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.78
% 0.61/0.78 % (2187)Memory used [KB]: 1040
% 0.61/0.78 % (2187)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.78 % (2187)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.78 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.61/0.78 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.78
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)Memory used [KB]: 1110
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.61/0.78 % (2188)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.61/0.78 % (2181)Success in time 0.423 s
% 0.61/0.79 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------