TSTP Solution File: NUM843+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM843+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:52:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.79s 2.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  13 unt;  14 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (  12   ~;  14   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   20 (  11   >;   9   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (;  19   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ less > leq > greater > geq > vplus > #nlpp > vsucc > vskolem2 > vd391 > vd390 > v1 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(greater,type,
    greater: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(vplus,type,
    vplus: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(vd390,type,
    vd390: $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(vd391,type,
    vd391: $i ).

tff(less,type,
    less: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(vskolem2,type,
    vskolem2: $i > $i ).

tff(vsucc,type,
    vsucc: $i > $i ).

tff(v1,type,
    v1: $i ).

tff(geq,type,
    geq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_127,axiom,
    ! [Vd244,Vd245] :
      ( geq(Vd245,Vd244)
    <=> ( greater(Vd245,Vd244)
        | ( Vd245 = Vd244 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)),16),1)) ).

tff(f_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(vd390,vd391),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',holds(244,394,0)) ).

tff(f_141,axiom,
    ! [Vd203,Vd204] :
      ( ( Vd203 = Vd204 )
      | greater(Vd203,Vd204)
      | less(Vd203,Vd204) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(goal(130),0),0)) ).

tff(f_121,axiom,
    ! [Vd249,Vd250] :
      ( leq(Vd250,Vd249)
    <=> ( less(Vd250,Vd249)
        | ( Vd250 = Vd249 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)),17),1)) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    ~ leq(vd390,vd391),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',holds(conjunct2(243),393,0)) ).

tff(f_115,axiom,
    ! [Vd254,Vd255] :
      ( geq(Vd254,Vd255)
     => leq(Vd255,Vd254) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ass(cond(158,0),0)) ).

tff(c_55,plain,
    ! [Vd245_52] : geq(Vd245_52,Vd245_52),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_127]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ~ greater(vd390,vd391),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_868,plain,
    ! [Vd203_202,Vd204_203] :
      ( less(Vd203_202,Vd204_203)
      | greater(Vd203_202,Vd204_203)
      | ( Vd204_203 = Vd203_202 ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_141]) ).

tff(c_51,plain,
    ! [Vd250_50,Vd249_49] :
      ( ~ less(Vd250_50,Vd249_49)
      | leq(Vd250_50,Vd249_49) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_121]) ).

tff(c_4810,plain,
    ! [Vd203_363,Vd204_364] :
      ( leq(Vd203_363,Vd204_364)
      | greater(Vd203_363,Vd204_364)
      | ( Vd204_364 = Vd203_363 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_868,c_51]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ~ leq(vd390,vd391),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_4824,plain,
    ( greater(vd390,vd391)
    | ( vd391 = vd390 ) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4810,c_4]) ).

tff(c_4831,plain,
    vd391 = vd390,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_4824]) ).

tff(c_927,plain,
    ! [Vd245_208,Vd244_209] :
      ( ( Vd245_208 = Vd244_209 )
      | greater(Vd245_208,Vd244_209)
      | ~ geq(Vd245_208,Vd244_209) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_127]) ).

tff(c_982,plain,
    ( ( vd391 = vd390 )
    | ~ geq(vd390,vd391) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_927,c_2]) ).

tff(c_1016,plain,
    ~ geq(vd390,vd391),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_982]) ).

tff(c_4849,plain,
    ~ geq(vd390,vd390),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4831,c_1016]) ).

tff(c_4869,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_55,c_4849]) ).

tff(c_4870,plain,
    vd391 = vd390,
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_982]) ).

tff(c_276,plain,
    ! [Vd255_147,Vd254_148] :
      ( leq(Vd255_147,Vd254_148)
      | ~ geq(Vd254_148,Vd255_147) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_115]) ).

tff(c_284,plain,
    ~ geq(vd391,vd390),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_276,c_4]) ).

tff(c_4875,plain,
    ~ geq(vd390,vd390),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4870,c_284]) ).

tff(c_4884,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_55,c_4875]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : NUM843+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:27:52 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.79/2.76  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.79/2.77  
% 6.79/2.77  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.79/2.79  
% 6.79/2.79  Inference rules
% 6.79/2.79  ----------------------
% 6.79/2.79  #Ref     : 3
% 6.79/2.79  #Sup     : 1262
% 6.79/2.79  #Fact    : 0
% 6.79/2.79  #Define  : 0
% 6.79/2.79  #Split   : 1
% 6.79/2.79  #Chain   : 0
% 6.79/2.79  #Close   : 0
% 6.79/2.79  
% 6.79/2.79  Ordering : KBO
% 6.79/2.79  
% 6.79/2.79  Simplification rules
% 6.79/2.79  ----------------------
% 6.79/2.79  #Subsume      : 233
% 6.79/2.79  #Demod        : 267
% 6.79/2.79  #Tautology    : 219
% 6.79/2.79  #SimpNegUnit  : 25
% 6.79/2.79  #BackRed      : 36
% 6.79/2.79  
% 6.79/2.79  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.79/2.79  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 6.79/2.79  
% 6.79/2.79  Timing (in seconds)
% 6.79/2.79  ----------------------
% 6.79/2.80  Preprocessing        : 0.61
% 6.79/2.80  Parsing              : 0.32
% 6.79/2.80  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 6.79/2.80  Main loop            : 1.09
% 6.79/2.80  Inferencing          : 0.32
% 6.79/2.80  Reduction            : 0.40
% 6.79/2.80  Demodulation         : 0.27
% 6.79/2.80  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 6.79/2.80  Subsumption          : 0.25
% 6.79/2.80  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 6.79/2.80  MUC search           : 0.00
% 6.79/2.80  Cooper               : 0.00
% 6.79/2.80  Total                : 1.75
% 6.79/2.80  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 6.79/2.80  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 6.79/2.80  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 6.79/2.80  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------