TSTP Solution File: NUM840+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : NUM840+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:46:23 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.56s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 77 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 67 ( 30 ~; 28 |; 2 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 46 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f298,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f121,f128,f295]) ).
fof(f295,plain,
~ spl4_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f294]) ).
fof(f294,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl4_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f266,f101]) ).
fof(f101,plain,
! [X1] : ~ less(X1,X1),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f80]) ).
fof(f80,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( X0 != X1
| ~ less(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).
fof(f44,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ less(X0,X1)
| X0 != X1 ),
inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f20,axiom,
! [X26,X27] :
( ~ less(X26,X27)
| X26 != X27 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1)') ).
fof(f266,plain,
( less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd328,vd330))
| ~ spl4_1 ),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f76,f129,f84]) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ less(X0,X1)
| ~ less(X1,X2)
| less(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).
fof(f65,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( less(X0,X2)
| ~ less(X0,X1)
| ~ less(X1,X2) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f64]) ).
fof(f64,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( less(X0,X2)
| ~ less(X0,X1)
| ~ less(X1,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( less(X0,X1)
& less(X1,X2) )
=> less(X0,X2) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
! [X11,X12,X13] :
( ( less(X11,X12)
& less(X12,X13) )
=> less(X11,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(168, 0), 0)') ).
fof(f129,plain,
( ! [X0] : less(vplus(vd329,X0),vplus(vd328,X0))
| ~ spl4_1 ),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f116,f85]) ).
fof(f85,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( less(vplus(X0,X2),vplus(X1,X2))
| ~ less(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( less(vplus(X0,X2),vplus(X1,X2))
| ~ less(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( less(X0,X1)
=> less(vplus(X0,X2),vplus(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 0)') ).
fof(f116,plain,
( less(vd329,vd328)
| ~ spl4_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f114]) ).
fof(f114,plain,
( spl4_1
<=> less(vd329,vd328) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])]) ).
fof(f76,plain,
less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(antec(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))), 335, 0)') ).
fof(f128,plain,
~ spl4_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f127]) ).
fof(f127,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f124,f101]) ).
fof(f124,plain,
( less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd328,vd330))
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f76,f120]) ).
fof(f120,plain,
( vd328 = vd329
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f118]) ).
fof(f118,plain,
( spl4_2
<=> vd328 = vd329 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).
fof(f121,plain,
( spl4_1
| spl4_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f112,f118,f114]) ).
fof(f112,plain,
( vd328 = vd329
| less(vd329,vd328) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f109,f81]) ).
fof(f81,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( greater(X0,X1)
| X0 = X1
| less(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).
fof(f45,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( less(X0,X1)
| greater(X0,X1)
| X0 = X1 ),
inference(rectify,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f19,axiom,
! [X26,X27] :
( less(X26,X27)
| greater(X26,X27)
| X26 = X27 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)') ).
fof(f109,plain,
~ greater(vd329,vd328),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f73,f82]) ).
fof(f82,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ greater(X0,X1)
| less(X1,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).
fof(f62,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( less(X1,X0)
| ~ greater(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).
fof(f46,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( greater(X0,X1)
=> less(X1,X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
! [X24,X25] :
( greater(X24,X25)
=> less(X25,X24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','ass(cond(140, 0), 0)') ).
fof(f73,plain,
~ less(vd328,vd329),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).
fof(f41,plain,
~ less(vd328,vd329),
inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ less(vd328,vd329),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
less(vd328,vd329),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','holds(conseq(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))), 336, 0)') ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM840+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 06:11:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.74 % (32517)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.56/0.74 % (32519)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.56/0.74 % (32520)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.74 % (32524)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.56/0.74 % (32522)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.74 % (32521)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-32495"
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.74
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)Memory used [KB]: 1091
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.56/0.74 % (32523)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.56/0.74 % (32495)Success in time 0.382 s
% 0.56/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------