TSTP Solution File: NUM837+2 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : NUM837+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:58:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUM837+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 12:34:32 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.40 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.40 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.19/0.40 fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1)', axiom, ![Vd203, Vd204]: (Vd203!=Vd204 | ~less(Vd203, Vd204))).
% 0.19/0.40 fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2)', axiom, ![Vd203_2, Vd204_2]: (~greater(Vd203_2, Vd204_2) | ~less(Vd203_2, Vd204_2))).
% 0.19/0.40 fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 3)', axiom, ![Vd203_2, Vd204_2]: (Vd203_2!=Vd204_2 | ~greater(Vd203_2, Vd204_2))).
% 0.19/0.40 fof('ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 1)', axiom, ![Vd120, Vd121]: (Vd120!=Vd121 | ~?[Vd125]: Vd121=vplus(Vd120, Vd125))).
% 0.19/0.40 fof('ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 2)', axiom, ![Vd120_2, Vd121_2]: (~?[Vd123]: Vd120_2=vplus(Vd121_2, Vd123) | ~?[Vd125_2]: Vd121_2=vplus(Vd120_2, Vd125_2))).
% 0.19/0.40 fof('ass(cond(goal(88), 0), 3)', axiom, ![Vd120_2, Vd121_2]: (Vd120_2!=Vd121_2 | ~?[Vd123_2]: Vd120_2=vplus(Vd121_2, Vd123_2))).
% 0.19/0.40 fof('def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)', axiom, ![Vd198, Vd199]: (less(Vd199, Vd198) <=> ?[Vd201]: Vd198=vplus(Vd199, Vd201))).
% 0.19/0.40 fof('holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)', axiom, less(vd268, vd269)).
% 0.19/0.40 fof('qe(171)', conjecture, ?[Vd273]: vd269=vplus(vd268, Vd273)).
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.19/0.40 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.19/0.40 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.19/0.40 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.19/0.40 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.19/0.40 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.19/0.40 variables of u and v.
% 0.19/0.40 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.19/0.40 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Axiom 1 (holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)): less(vd268, vd269) = true2.
% 0.19/0.40 Axiom 2 (def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)_1): fresh3(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.19/0.40 Axiom 3 (def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)_1): fresh3(less(X, Y), true2, Y, X) = vplus(X, vd201(Y, X)).
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Goal 1 (qe(171)): vd269 = vplus(vd268, X).
% 0.19/0.40 The goal is true when:
% 0.19/0.40 X = vd201(vd269, vd268)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Proof:
% 0.19/0.40 vd269
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 2 (def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)_1) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 fresh3(true2, true2, vd269, vd268)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 fresh3(less(vd268, vd269), true2, vd269, vd268)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 3 (def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)_1) }
% 0.19/0.40 vplus(vd268, vd201(vd269, vd268))
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------