TSTP Solution File: NUM837+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : NUM837+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 09:07:54 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 1 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 1 sgn 8 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof('qe(171)',conjecture,
? [X1] : vd269 = vplus(vd268,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kO7I0keyVC/E---3.1_5229.p','qe(171)') ).
fof('def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)',axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( less(X17,X16)
<=> ? [X18] : X16 = vplus(X17,X18) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kO7I0keyVC/E---3.1_5229.p','def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)') ).
fof('holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)',axiom,
less(vd268,vd269),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kO7I0keyVC/E---3.1_5229.p','holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)') ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] : vd269 = vplus(vd268,X1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qe(171)']) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X34] : vd269 != vplus(vd268,X34),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X35,X36,X38,X39,X40] :
( ( ~ less(X36,X35)
| X35 = vplus(X36,esk1_2(X35,X36)) )
& ( X38 != vplus(X39,X40)
| less(X39,X38) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['def(cond(conseq(axiom(3)), 12), 1)'])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
vd269 != vplus(vd268,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( X2 = vplus(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1))
| ~ less(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
less(vd268,vd269),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(conjunct1(170), 270, 0)']) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : NUM837+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 09:19:10 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kO7I0keyVC/E---3.1_5229.p
% 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # new_bool_3 with pid 5309 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 5312 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 22
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 18
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 50
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 45
% 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 11
% 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 54
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 41
% 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 42
% 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 12
% 0.17/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 16
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of those cached : 5
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 10
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 23
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 17
% 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8
% 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1462
% 0.17/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 304
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------