%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM787^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:57:43 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.55s 3.74s
% Output   : Proof 3.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : NUM787^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 11:39:05 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.55/3.74  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.74  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (less x0 y0)) True
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx0 Xy0 : rat), Not (is Xx0 Xy0) → Not (more Xx0 Xy0) → less Xx0 Xy0) True
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Not (more x0 y0) → is x0 y0)) True
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #8 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (less x0 y0) False
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #9 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Not (more x0 y0) → is x0 y0) False
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): Eq (Not (more x0 y0)) True
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #11 (by clausification #[9]): Eq (is x0 y0) False
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): Eq (more x0 y0) False
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #13 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : rat), Eq (∀ (Xy0 : rat), Not (is a Xy0) → Not (more a Xy0) → less a Xy0) True
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Eq (Not (is a a_1) → Not (more a a_1) → less a a_1) True
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Or (Eq (Not (is a a_1)) False) (Eq (Not (more a a_1) → less a a_1) True)
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Or (Eq (Not (more a a_1) → less a a_1) True) (Eq (is a a_1) True)
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Or (Eq (is a a_1) True) (Or (Eq (Not (more a a_1)) False) (Eq (less a a_1) True))
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 : rat), Or (Eq (is a a_1) True) (Or (Eq (less a a_1) True) (Eq (more a a_1) True))
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #19 (by superposition #[18, 8]): Or (Eq (is x0 y0) True) (Or (Eq (more x0 y0) True) (Eq True False))
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): Or (Eq (is x0 y0) True) (Eq (more x0 y0) True)
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #21 (by forward demodulation #[20, 11]): Or (Eq False True) (Eq (more x0 y0) True)
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): Eq (more x0 y0) True
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #23 (by superposition #[22, 12]): Eq True False
% 3.55/3.74  Clause #24 (by clausification #[23]): False
% 3.55/3.74  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------