TSTP Solution File: NUM783^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : NUM783^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:45:53 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 5 unt; 9 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 89 ( 10 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 171 ( 13 ~; 0 |; 1 &; 153 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 12 ( 12 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 ^ 12 !; 0 ?; 12 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
rat: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
rat: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
x0: rat ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
y0: rat ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
or3: $o > $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
is: rat > rat > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
more: rat > rat > $o ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
less: rat > rat > $o ).
thf(func_def_7,type,
ec3: $o > $o > $o > $o ).
thf(f22,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f17,f20]) ).
thf(f20,plain,
! [X0: rat,X1: rat] :
( ( or3 @ ( is @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
thf(f15,plain,
! [X0: rat,X1: rat] :
( ( ( or3 @ ( is @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= $true )
& ( ( ec3 @ ( is @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= $true ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
! [X0: rat,X1: rat] :
~ ( ( ( or3 @ ( is @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= $true )
=> ( ( ec3 @ ( is @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
!= $true ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
! [X0: rat,X1: rat] :
~ ( ( ( or3 @ ( is @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= $true )
=> ( ( ec3 @ ( is @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
!= $true ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
! [X0: rat,X1: rat] :
~ ( ( or3 @ ( is @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
=> ~ ( ec3 @ ( is @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,axiom,
! [X1: rat,X2: rat] :
~ ( ( or3 @ ( is @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( more @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( less @ X1 @ X2 ) )
=> ~ ( ec3 @ ( is @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( more @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( less @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz81) ).
thf(f17,plain,
( ( or3 @ ( is @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( more @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( less @ x0 @ y0 ) )
!= $true ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
( ( or3 @ ( is @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( more @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( less @ x0 @ y0 ) )
!= $true ),
inference(flattening,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
( ( or3 @ ( is @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( more @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( less @ x0 @ y0 ) )
!= $true ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
~ ( or3 @ ( is @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( more @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( less @ x0 @ y0 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( or3 @ ( is @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( more @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( less @ x0 @ y0 ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).
thf(f3,conjecture,
or3 @ ( is @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( more @ x0 @ y0 ) @ ( less @ x0 @ y0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz81a) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUM783^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 03:56:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.34 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 % (3043)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (3037)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 % (3042)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 % (3043)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 % (3044)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 % (3036)Success in time 0.015 s
% 0.13/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------