TSTP Solution File: NUM770^1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : NUM770^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cVtPDPspCP true

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:44:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.72s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   9 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (   7   ~;   5   |;   0   &;  76   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0   ^;  13   !;   0   ?;  13   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(frac_type,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(moref_type,type,
    moref: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(y_type,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(pf_type,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(mf_type,type,
    mf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(eq_type,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(v_type,type,
    v: frac ).

thf(x_type,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(satz67e,conjecture,
    eq @ v @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( eq @ v @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[satz67e]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
    ~ ( eq @ v @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(satz67c,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ Xx @ Xy )
     => ( eq @ ( pf @ Xy @ ( mf @ Xx @ Xy ) ) @ Xx ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ ( pf @ X0 @ ( mf @ X1 @ X0 ) ) @ X1 )
      | ~ ( moref @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz67c]) ).

thf(e,axiom,
    eq @ ( pf @ y @ v ) @ x ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
    eq @ ( pf @ y @ v ) @ x,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[e]) ).

thf(satz67b,axiom,
    ! [Xx: frac,Xy: frac,Xv: frac,Xw: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ ( pf @ Xy @ Xv ) @ Xx )
     => ( ( eq @ ( pf @ Xy @ Xw ) @ Xx )
       => ( eq @ Xv @ Xw ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 )
      | ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ X0 @ X3 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[satz67b]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ y @ X0 ) @ x )
      | ( eq @ v @ X0 ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
    ( ~ ( moref @ x @ y )
    | ( eq @ v @ ( mf @ x @ y ) ) ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl5]) ).

thf(m,axiom,
    moref @ x @ y ).

thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
    moref @ x @ y,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[m]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl19,plain,
    eq @ v @ ( mf @ x @ y ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl14,zip_derived_cl0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl4,zip_derived_cl19]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : NUM770^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cVtPDPspCP true
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 08:00:39 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.32  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.32  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.32  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.32  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.33  % Running in HO mode
% 0.17/0.61  % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.17/0.61  % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.17/0.61  % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.17/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.17/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.17/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.17/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.17/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.17/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.17/0.72  % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 0.17/0.72  % done 10 iterations in 0.016s
% 0.17/0.72  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.17/0.72  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.72  
% 0.17/0.72  
% 0.17/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.17/0.72  % Terminating...
% 1.45/0.81  % Runner terminated.
% 1.79/0.82  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------