TSTP Solution File: NUM753^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : NUM753^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:57:42 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  12 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  225 (  28   ~;  25   |;   0   &; 166   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   6   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   0   ^  57   !;   0   ?;  57   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(decl_22,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    u: frac ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    moref: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(satz44,axiom,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X4: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X1 @ X2 )
     => ( ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
       => ( ( eq @ X2 @ X4 )
         => ( moref @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ShvtgRvti5/E---3.1_18073.p',satz44) ).

thf(satz56,axiom,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X4: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X1 @ X2 )
     => ( ( eq @ X3 @ X4 )
       => ( eq @ ( pf @ X1 @ X3 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ShvtgRvti5/E---3.1_18073.p',satz56) ).

thf(satz62d,axiom,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X1 @ X2 )
     => ( moref @ ( pf @ X3 @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ShvtgRvti5/E---3.1_18073.p',satz62d) ).

thf(satz37,axiom,
    ! [X1: frac] : ( eq @ X1 @ X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ShvtgRvti5/E---3.1_18073.p',satz37) ).

thf(satz62g,conjecture,
    moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ShvtgRvti5/E---3.1_18073.p',satz62g) ).

thf(e,axiom,
    eq @ x @ y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ShvtgRvti5/E---3.1_18073.p',e) ).

thf(m,axiom,
    moref @ z @ u,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ShvtgRvti5/E---3.1_18073.p',m) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X17: frac,X18: frac,X19: frac,X20: frac] :
      ( ~ ( moref @ X17 @ X18 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X17 @ X19 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X18 @ X20 )
      | ( moref @ X19 @ X20 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz44])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X24: frac,X25: frac,X26: frac,X27: frac] :
      ( ~ ( eq @ X24 @ X25 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X26 @ X27 )
      | ( eq @ ( pf @ X24 @ X26 ) @ ( pf @ X25 @ X27 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz56])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X4: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( moref @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X2 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X4: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ ( pf @ X1 @ X3 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( eq @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X21: frac,X22: frac,X23: frac] :
      ( ~ ( moref @ X21 @ X22 )
      | ( moref @ ( pf @ X23 @ X21 ) @ ( pf @ X23 @ X22 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz62d])])]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X4: frac,X6: frac,X5: frac,X3: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X1 @ ( pf @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( moref @ X4 @ ( pf @ X5 @ X6 ) )
      | ~ ( eq @ X4 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X6 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X5 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X3: frac,X2: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ ( pf @ X3 @ X1 ) @ ( pf @ X3 @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( moref @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X28: frac] : ( eq @ X28 @ X28 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz37]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz62g])]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X4: frac,X3: frac,X5: frac,X6: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ X1 @ ( pf @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      | ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ X4 @ X5 ) @ X1 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X6 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X4 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( moref @ X5 @ X6 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1: frac] : ( eq @ X1 @ X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X4: frac,X3: frac,X5: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ ( pf @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( eq @ X5 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( moref @ X2 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( moref @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ u ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X4: frac] :
      ( ( moref @ ( pf @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( eq @ X1 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( moref @ X2 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    eq @ x @ y,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[e]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    moref @ z @ u,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : NUM753^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 09:17:58 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ShvtgRvti5/E---3.1_18073.p
% 0.20/0.49  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # new_bool_1 with pid 18152 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # new_ho_10 with pid 18159 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49  # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49  # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 15
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.20/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.20/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 29
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 29
% 0.20/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 31
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 29
% 0.20/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 31
% 0.20/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.20/0.49  # ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.20/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 22
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.20/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.20/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 18
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.20/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 61
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.20/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 149
% 0.20/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 104
% 0.20/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.20/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 29
% 0.20/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1453
% 0.20/0.49  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 112
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.20/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------