TSTP Solution File: NUM750^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : NUM750^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:45:30 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.33s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  16 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   98 (  28 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  168 (  19   ~;  11   |;   0   &; 132   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0   ^  32   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    eq: frac > frac > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    pf: frac > frac > frac ).

thf(f26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f25,f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X0 @ X0 )
      = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X0 @ X0 )
      = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: frac] : ( eq @ X0 @ X0 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0: frac] : ( eq @ X0 @ X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz37) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( eq @ z @ z )
   != $true ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f24,f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( eq @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( eq @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    eq @ x @ y,
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    eq @ x @ y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',e) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( ( eq @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | ( ( eq @ z @ z )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( ( eq @ z @ z )
     != $true )
    | ( ( eq @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f20,f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( eq @ ( pf @ X3 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X3 @ X0 ) )
      | ( ( eq @ X2 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( ( eq @ X2 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( eq @ ( pf @ X3 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X3 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( eq @ X0 @ X3 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( eq @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( eq @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X0 @ X3 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( eq @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac,X0: frac] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( eq @ X1 @ X2 ) )
     => ( ( $true
          = ( eq @ X0 @ X3 ) )
       => ( $true
          = ( eq @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: frac,X1: frac,X2: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X1 @ X2 )
     => ( ( eq @ X0 @ X3 )
       => ( eq @ ( pf @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( pf @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2: frac,X0: frac,X1: frac,X3: frac] :
      ( ( eq @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( ( eq @ X2 @ X3 )
       => ( eq @ ( pf @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( pf @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz56) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,conjecture,
    eq @ ( pf @ x @ z ) @ ( pf @ y @ z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz62b) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : NUM750^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 05:30:38 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.31  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.11/0.32  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6730)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (6733)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6731)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6732)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6729)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)First to succeed.
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6728)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6732)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6734)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6729)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.16/0.33  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.33  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6727)------------------------------
% 0.16/0.33  % (6726)Success in time 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.33  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------