TSTP Solution File: NUM750^1 by Duper---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Duper---1.0
% Problem : NUM750^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : duper %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:57:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.37s 3.76s
% Output : Proof 3.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUM750^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 12:37:13 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 3.37/3.76 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.37/3.76 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (eq x y) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz Xu : frac), eq Xx Xy → eq Xz Xu → eq (pf Xx Xz) (pf Xy Xu)) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx : frac), eq Xx Xx) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (eq (pf x z) (pf y z))) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (eq a a) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (eq (pf x z) (pf y z)) False
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #6 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz Xu : frac), eq a Xy → eq Xz Xu → eq (pf a Xz) (pf Xy Xu)) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xz Xu : frac), eq a a_1 → eq Xz Xu → eq (pf a Xz) (pf a_1 Xu)) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : frac), Eq (∀ (Xu : frac), eq a a_1 → eq a_2 Xu → eq (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 Xu)) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Eq (eq a a_1 → eq a_2 a_3 → eq (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 a_3)) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (eq a a_1) False) (Eq (eq a_2 a_3 → eq (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 a_3)) True)
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : frac), Or (Eq (eq a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq a_2 a_3) False) (Eq (eq (pf a a_2) (pf a_1 a_3)) True))
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #12 (by superposition #[11, 0]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Or (Eq (eq a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (eq (pf x a) (pf y a_1)) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #17 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Or (Eq (eq a a_1) False) (Eq (eq (pf x a) (pf y a_1)) True)
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #19 (by superposition #[17, 4]): ∀ (a : frac), Or (Eq (eq (pf x a) (pf y a)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (eq (pf x a) (pf y a)) True
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #21 (by superposition #[20, 5]): Eq True False
% 3.37/3.76 Clause #25 (by clausification #[21]): False
% 3.37/3.76 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------