TSTP Solution File: NUM730^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : NUM730^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:45:16 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   6 unt;  14 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  219 (   5   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 214   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  13   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0   ^   8   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(type_def_7,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    orec3: $o > $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    ts: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    c1x: frac > nat ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    c2y: frac > nat ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    c1y: frac > nat ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    c2x: frac > nat ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    more: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    less: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(f12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f11,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( orec3 @ ( X0 = X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( orec3 @ ( X0 = X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] : ( orec3 @ ( X0 = X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] : ( orec3 @ ( X0 = X1 ) @ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz10) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( orec3
      @ ( ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) )
        = ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( more @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( less @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( orec3
      @ ( ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) )
        = ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( more @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( less @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( orec3
      @ ( ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) )
        = ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( more @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( less @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ( orec3
      @ ( ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) )
        = ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( more @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( less @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( orec3
      @ ( ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) )
        = ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( more @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
      @ ( less @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ( orec3
    @ ( ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) )
      = ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
    @ ( more @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) )
    @ ( less @ ( ts @ ( c1x @ x ) @ ( c2y @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( c1y @ y ) @ ( c2x @ x ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz41) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : NUM730^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 06:10:52 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.34  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.12/0.34  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1219)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1214)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1220)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1217)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1216)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)First to succeed.
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1218)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1215)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1214)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1213)------------------------------
% 0.12/0.36  % (1212)Success in time 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.36  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------