TSTP Solution File: NUM701^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : NUM701^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:44:58 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  15 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  19 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   86 (  10   ~;   4   |;   0   &;  69   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0   ^  14   !;   0   ?;  15   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    less: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    suc: nat > nat ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    lessis: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    n_1: nat ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    $true != $true,
    inference(superposition,[],[f18,f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( lessis @ y @ x )
    = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( lessis @ y @ x )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f19,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( less @ y @ ( suc @ x ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( less @ y @ ( suc @ x ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    less @ y @ ( suc @ x ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    less @ y @ ( suc @ x ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( less @ X0 @ ( suc @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f15,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( pl @ X0 @ n_1 )
      = ( suc @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( pl @ X0 @ n_1 )
      = ( suc @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz4e) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( less @ X0 @ ( pl @ X1 @ n_1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( less @ X0 @ ( pl @ X1 @ n_1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( less @ X0 @ ( pl @ X1 @ n_1 ) ) )
     => ( $true
        = ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( less @ X0 @ ( pl @ X1 @ n_1 ) )
     => ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( less @ X1 @ ( pl @ X0 @ n_1 ) )
     => ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz26) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( lessis @ y @ x )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( lessis @ y @ x )
   != $true ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( lessis @ y @ x )
   != $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ( lessis @ y @ x ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( lessis @ y @ x ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,conjecture,
    lessis @ y @ x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz26a) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : NUM701^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 05:04:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.38  ipcrm: permission denied for id (1664647177)
% 0.22/0.41  ipcrm: permission denied for id (1664712734)
% 0.22/0.50  ipcrm: permission denied for id (1664811114)
% 0.22/0.54  % (21952)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/0.54  % (21953)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.54  % (21952)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.54  % (21956)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/18Mi)
% 0.22/0.54  % (21955)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/275Mi)
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.54  % (21954)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  % (21950)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/183Mi)
% 0.22/0.55  % (21953)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.55  % (21955)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.55  % (21955)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  % (21955)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.55  % (21955)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  % (21955)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.55  % (21955)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.55  % (21955)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.22/0.55  % (21955)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  % (21955)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  % (21952)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.55  % (21952)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  % (21952)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.55  % (21952)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  % (21952)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.55  % (21952)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.55  % (21952)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.55  % (21952)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  % (21952)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.55  % (21814)Success in time 0.172 s
% 0.22/0.55  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------