TSTP Solution File: NUM692^4 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : NUM692^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:15:37 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.36s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   33
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   78 (  33 unt;  19 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  283 (  47 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  673 (  70   ~;  53   |;  10   &; 491   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  49  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   41 (  41   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   22 (  19 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  113 (  72   ^  41   !;   0   ?; 113   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
    is_of: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    all_of: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_61,type,
    imp: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    d_not: $o > $o ).

thf(decl_67,type,
    l_or: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(decl_72,type,
    l_some: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_77,type,
    e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_123,type,
    nat: $i ).

thf(decl_124,type,
    n_is: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_127,type,
    n_some: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_142,type,
    n_pl: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_147,type,
    diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_149,type,
    iii: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_152,type,
    lessis: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_155,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(decl_156,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(decl_157,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(decl_158,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

thf(def_d_not,axiom,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [X76: $o] : ( imp @ X76 @ ~ $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax',def_d_not) ).

thf(def_imp,axiom,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [X74: $o,X75: $o] :
          ( X74
         => X75 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax',def_imp) ).

thf(def_iii,axiom,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X211: $i] : ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X211 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',def_iii) ).

thf(def_l_or,axiom,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [X83: $o] : ( imp @ ( d_not @ X83 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax',def_l_or) ).

thf(def_e_is,axiom,
    ( e_is
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X101: $i,X102: $i] : ( X101 = X102 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax',def_e_is) ).

thf(def_lessis,axiom,
    ( lessis
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X230: $i] : ( l_or @ ( iii @ X1 @ X230 ) @ ( n_is @ X1 @ X230 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',def_lessis) ).

thf(def_n_some,axiom,
    ( n_some
    = ( l_some @ nat ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax',def_n_some) ).

thf(def_n_is,axiom,
    ( n_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax',def_n_is) ).

thf(def_all_of,axiom,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [X3: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( is_of @ X4 @ X3 )
         => ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax',def_all_of) ).

thf(def_is_of,axiom,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] : ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax',def_is_of) ).

thf(satz23a,conjecture,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ nat )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X321: $i] : ( in @ X321 @ nat )
        @ ^ [X322: $i] :
            ( all_of
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ nat )
            @ ^ [X4: $i] :
                ( all_of
                @ ^ [X13: $i] : ( in @ X13 @ nat )
                @ ^ [X13: $i] :
                    ( ( lessis @ X1 @ X322 )
                   => ( ( lessis @ X4 @ X13 )
                     => ( lessis @ ( n_pl @ X1 @ X4 ) @ ( n_pl @ X322 @ X13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz23a) ).

thf(satz22d,axiom,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ nat )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X317: $i] : ( in @ X317 @ nat )
        @ ^ [X318: $i] :
            ( all_of
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ nat )
            @ ^ [X4: $i] :
                ( all_of
                @ ^ [X13: $i] : ( in @ X13 @ nat )
                @ ^ [X13: $i] :
                    ( ( iii @ X1 @ X318 )
                   => ( ( lessis @ X4 @ X13 )
                     => ( iii @ ( n_pl @ X1 @ X4 ) @ ( n_pl @ X318 @ X13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz22d) ).

thf(satz19c,axiom,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ nat )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X271: $i] : ( in @ X271 @ nat )
        @ ^ [X272: $i] :
            ( all_of
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ nat )
            @ ^ [X4: $i] :
                ( ( iii @ X1 @ X272 )
               => ( iii @ ( n_pl @ X1 @ X4 ) @ ( n_pl @ X272 @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz19c) ).

thf(satz19f,axiom,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ nat )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X277: $i] : ( in @ X277 @ nat )
        @ ^ [X278: $i] :
            ( all_of
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ nat )
            @ ^ [X4: $i] :
                ( ( iii @ X1 @ X278 )
               => ( iii @ ( n_pl @ X4 @ X1 ) @ ( n_pl @ X4 @ X278 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz19f) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_not]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_imp]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_iii]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( ( Z0
           => ~ $true )
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_or]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( e_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] : ( Z1 = Z2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_is]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( lessis
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0 ) )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_lessis]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( iii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,def_n_some]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( l_or
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( ( Z0
           => ~ $true )
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]),c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_23,axiom,
    ( n_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is,c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] : ( Z1 @ Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( lessis
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ Z1 @ Z0 ) )
           => ~ $true )
         => ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X393: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X393 @ nat )
       => ! [X392: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X392 @ nat )
           => ! [X391: $i] :
                ( ( in @ X391 @ nat )
               => ! [X390: $i] :
                    ( ( in @ X390 @ nat )
                   => ( ( ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X392 @ X393 ) )
                         => ~ $true )
                       => ( X393 = X392 ) )
                     => ( ( ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X390 @ X391 ) )
                           => ~ $true )
                         => ( X391 = X390 ) )
                       => ( ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X392 @ X390 ) @ ( n_pl @ X393 @ X391 ) ) )
                           => ~ $true )
                         => ( ( n_pl @ X393 @ X391 )
                            = ( n_pl @ X392 @ X390 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz23a])]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

thf(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X488: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X488 @ nat )
     => ! [X487: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X487 @ nat )
         => ! [X486: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X486 @ nat )
             => ! [X485: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X485 @ nat )
                 => ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X487 @ X488 ) )
                   => ( ( ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X485 @ X486 ) )
                         => ~ $true )
                       => ( X486 = X485 ) )
                     => ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X487 @ X485 ) @ ( n_pl @ X488 @ X486 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz22d]),c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( in @ esk1_0 @ nat )
    & ( in @ esk2_0 @ nat )
    & ( in @ esk3_0 @ nat )
    & ( in @ esk4_0 @ nat )
    & ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
      | ( esk1_0 = esk2_0 ) )
    & ( $true
      | ( esk1_0 = esk2_0 ) )
    & ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
      | ( esk3_0 = esk4_0 ) )
    & ( $true
      | ( esk3_0 = esk4_0 ) )
    & ( ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0 ) @ ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) )
      | ~ $true )
    & ( ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
     != ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X692: $i,X693: $i,X694: $i,X695: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X695 @ X694 ) )
        | ~ $true
        | ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X693 @ X695 ) @ ( n_pl @ X692 @ X694 ) ) )
        | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X693 @ X692 ) )
        | ~ ( in @ X695 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X694 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X693 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X692 @ nat ) )
      & ( ( X694 != X695 )
        | ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X693 @ X695 ) @ ( n_pl @ X692 @ X694 ) ) )
        | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X693 @ X692 ) )
        | ~ ( in @ X695 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X694 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X693 @ nat )
        | ~ ( in @ X692 @ nat ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0 ) @ ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X5 @ X1 ) @ ( n_pl @ X6 @ X4 ) ) )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X1 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X5 @ X6 ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X6 @ nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0 ) @ ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X6: $i,X5: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X5 @ X1 ) @ ( n_pl @ X6 @ X4 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X6 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X5 @ X6 ) )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X1 @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk1_0 @ nat,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk2_0 @ nat,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk3_0 @ nat,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk4_0 @ nat,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
    | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_38]),c_0_39])]) ).

thf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
    | ( esk3_0 = esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X423: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X423 @ nat )
     => ! [X422: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X422 @ nat )
         => ! [X421: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X421 @ nat )
             => ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X422 @ X423 ) )
               => ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X422 @ X421 ) @ ( n_pl @ X423 @ X421 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz19c]),c_0_27]),c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk4_0 = esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

thf(c_0_44,plain,
    ! [X628: $i,X629: $i,X630: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ X628 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X629 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X630 @ nat )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X629 @ X628 ) )
      | ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X629 @ X630 ) @ ( n_pl @ X628 @ X630 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 ) @ ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) )
    | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_43]) ).

thf(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X5: $i,X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X4 @ X5 ) @ ( n_pl @ X1 @ X5 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ nat )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X4 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).

thf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) )
    | ( esk1_0 = esk2_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_38]),c_0_37]),c_0_36])]) ).

thf(c_0_49,plain,
    ! [X429: $i] :
      ( ( in @ X429 @ nat )
     => ! [X428: $i] :
          ( ( in @ X428 @ nat )
         => ! [X427: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X427 @ nat )
             => ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X428 @ X429 ) )
               => ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X427 @ X428 ) @ ( n_pl @ X427 @ X429 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz19f]),c_0_27]),c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

thf(c_0_51,plain,
    ! [X634: $i,X635: $i,X636: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ X634 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X635 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X636 @ nat )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X635 @ X634 ) )
      | ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X636 @ X635 ) @ ( n_pl @ X636 @ X634 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_49])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 ) @ ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_50]) ).

thf(c_0_53,plain,
    ! [X5: $i,X4: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ ( n_pl @ X5 @ X4 ) @ ( n_pl @ X5 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X4 @ nat )
      | ~ ( in @ X5 @ nat )
      | ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ X4 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]) ).

thf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 )
   != ( n_pl @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( l_some @ nat @ ( diffprop @ esk4_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_36]),c_0_39]),c_0_38])]) ).

thf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk4_0 )
   != ( n_pl @ esk1_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_50]) ).

thf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_55]) ).

thf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : NUM692^4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 04:36:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.64  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.36/0.64  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.36/0.64  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting almost_fo_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting pre_casc_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # full_lambda_9 with pid 11938 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.64  # Result found by full_lambda_9
% 0.36/0.64  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.36/0.64  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.36/0.64  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN
% 0.36/0.64  # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
% 0.36/0.64  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 25s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # full_lambda_5 with pid 11944 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.64  # Result found by full_lambda_5
% 0.36/0.64  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.36/0.64  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.36/0.64  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSMMSBN
% 0.36/0.64  # partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
% 0.36/0.64  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.64  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 25s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.36/0.64  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.36/0.64  
% 0.36/0.64  # Proof found!
% 0.36/0.64  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/0.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.64  # Parsed axioms                        : 396
% 0.36/0.64  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 263
% 0.36/0.64  # Initial clauses                      : 358
% 0.36/0.64  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 181
% 0.36/0.64  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 177
% 0.36/0.64  # Processed clauses                    : 388
% 0.36/0.64  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.36/0.64  # ...subsumed                          : 96
% 0.36/0.64  # ...remaining for further processing  : 287
% 0.36/0.64  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 26
% 0.36/0.64  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.36/0.64  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.36/0.64  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.36/0.64  # Generated clauses                    : 780
% 0.36/0.64  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 750
% 0.36/0.64  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.36/0.64  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.36/0.64  # Paramodulations                      : 582
% 0.36/0.64  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.36/0.64  # NegExts                              : 2
% 0.36/0.64  # Equation resolutions                 : 32
% 0.36/0.64  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.36/0.64  # Total rewrite steps                  : 126
% 0.36/0.64  # ...of those cached                   : 109
% 0.36/0.64  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.36/0.64  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.36/0.64  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.64  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.36/0.64  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.64  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.36/0.64  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.36/0.64  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.36/0.64  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.36/0.64  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.36/0.64  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.36/0.64  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.36/0.64  # Current number of processed clauses  : 143
% 0.36/0.64  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 0.36/0.64  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.64  #    Negative unit clauses             : 16
% 0.36/0.64  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 107
% 0.36/0.64  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 650
% 0.36/0.64  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3289
% 0.36/0.64  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.36/0.64  # Current number of archived clauses   : 126
% 0.36/0.64  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5112
% 0.36/0.64  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1193
% 0.36/0.64  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 91
% 0.36/0.64  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 124
% 0.36/0.64  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.36/0.64  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.36/0.64  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.36/0.64  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.36/0.64  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.36/0.64  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 67723
% 0.36/0.64  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 18326
% 0.36/0.64  
% 0.36/0.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.64  # User time                : 0.078 s
% 0.36/0.64  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.36/0.64  # Total time               : 0.090 s
% 0.36/0.64  # Maximum resident set size: 5048 pages
% 0.36/0.64  
% 0.36/0.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.64  # User time                : 0.091 s
% 0.36/0.64  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.36/0.64  # Total time               : 0.106 s
% 0.36/0.64  # Maximum resident set size: 2380 pages
% 0.36/0.64  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.36/0.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------