TSTP Solution File: NUM687_8 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : NUM687_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 09:07:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  10 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  16   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn  27   !;   0   ?;  27   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

tff(decl_22,type,
    x: nat ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    y: nat ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    z: nat ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    u: nat ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    more: ( nat * nat ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    pl: ( nat * nat ) > nat ).

tff(satz22a,conjecture,
    more(pl(x,z),pl(y,u)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.As7k4qvwA0/E---3.1_10980.p',satz22a) ).

tff(m,axiom,
    ( ~ more(x,y)
   => ( x = y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.As7k4qvwA0/E---3.1_10980.p',m) ).

tff(satz21,axiom,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( more(X2,X3)
     => ( more(X4,X5)
       => more(pl(X2,X4),pl(X3,X5)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.As7k4qvwA0/E---3.1_10980.p',satz21) ).

tff(n,axiom,
    more(z,u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.As7k4qvwA0/E---3.1_10980.p',n) ).

tff(satz19g,axiom,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( ( X2 = X3 )
     => ( more(X4,X5)
       => more(pl(X2,X4),pl(X3,X5)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.As7k4qvwA0/E---3.1_10980.p',satz19g) ).

tff(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ more(pl(x,z),pl(y,u)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz22a])]) ).

tff(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ more(x,y)
   => ( x = y ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m]) ).

tff(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ more(pl(x,z),pl(y,u)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

tff(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X10: nat,X11: nat,X12: nat,X13: nat] :
      ( ~ more(X10,X11)
      | ~ more(X12,X13)
      | more(pl(X10,X12),pl(X11,X13)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz21])])]) ).

tff(c_0_9,plain,
    ( more(x,y)
    | ( x = y ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

tcf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ more(pl(x,z),pl(y,u)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

tcf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( more(pl(X2,X4),pl(X3,X5))
      | ~ more(X2,X3)
      | ~ more(X4,X5) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_12,plain,
    more(z,u),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[n]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( more(x,y)
    | ( x = y ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ more(x,y),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

tff(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X6: nat,X7: nat,X8: nat,X9: nat] :
      ( ( X6 != X7 )
      | ~ more(X8,X9)
      | more(pl(X6,X8),pl(X7,X9)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz19g])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_16,plain,
    x = y,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

tcf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( more(pl(X2,X4),pl(X3,X5))
      | ( X2 != X3 )
      | ~ more(X4,X5) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

tcf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ more(pl(y,z),pl(y,u)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

tcf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat] :
      ( more(pl(X2,X3),pl(X2,X4))
      | ~ more(X3,X4) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09  % Problem    : NUM687_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 09:35:05 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.As7k4qvwA0/E---3.1_10980.p
% 0.16/0.42  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # new_bool_3 with pid 11058 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.42  # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11063 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.42  # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.42  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.42  
% 0.16/0.42  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.16/0.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8
% 0.16/0.42  # Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.16/0.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.16/0.42  # Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.16/0.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 15
% 0.16/0.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # Generated clauses                    : 6
% 0.16/0.42  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.16/0.42  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.16/0.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.16/0.42  # ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.16/0.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.16/0.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.16/0.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.16/0.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.16/0.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.16/0.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.16/0.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.16/0.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 406
% 0.16/0.42  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 54
% 0.16/0.42  
% 0.16/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.42  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.42  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.16/0.42  
% 0.16/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.42  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.42  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.16/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.16/0.42  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------