TSTP Solution File: NUM684^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : NUM684^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:44:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 12 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 23 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 61 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 0 &; 48 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 2 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 ^ 20 !; 0 ?; 20 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
nat: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
nat: $tType ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
x: nat ).
thf(func_def_2,type,
y: nat ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
z: nat ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
pl: nat > nat > nat ).
thf(f34,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f33,f12]) ).
thf(f12,plain,
x != y,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
x != y,
inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).
thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
x != y,
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4]) ).
thf(f4,conjecture,
x = y,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz20e) ).
thf(f33,plain,
x = y,
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f22]) ).
thf(f22,plain,
! [X0: nat] :
( ( ( pl @ x @ z )
!= ( pl @ X0 @ z ) )
| ( y = X0 ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f13,f16]) ).
thf(f16,plain,
( ( pl @ x @ z )
= ( pl @ y @ z ) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f15,f14]) ).
thf(f14,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
( ( pl @ X0 @ X1 )
= ( pl @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
thf(f3,axiom,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
( ( pl @ X0 @ X1 )
= ( pl @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz6) ).
thf(f15,plain,
( ( pl @ z @ x )
= ( pl @ y @ z ) ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f11,f14]) ).
thf(f11,plain,
( ( pl @ z @ x )
= ( pl @ z @ y ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,axiom,
( ( pl @ z @ x )
= ( pl @ z @ y ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i) ).
thf(f13,plain,
! [X2: nat,X0: nat,X1: nat] :
( ( ( pl @ X0 @ X2 )
!= ( pl @ X1 @ X2 ) )
| ( X0 = X1 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
thf(f10,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat,X2: nat] :
( ( X0 = X1 )
| ( ( pl @ X0 @ X2 )
!= ( pl @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f9]) ).
thf(f9,plain,
! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X0: nat] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
| ( ( pl @ X1 @ X0 )
!= ( pl @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
! [X1: nat,X0: nat,X2: nat] :
( ( ( pl @ X1 @ X0 )
= ( pl @ X2 @ X0 ) )
=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,axiom,
! [X2: nat,X1: nat,X0: nat] :
( ( ( pl @ X0 @ X2 )
= ( pl @ X1 @ X2 ) )
=> ( X0 = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz20b) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUM684^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 03:53:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.37 % (22219)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22220)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22222)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22221)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22226)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22225)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)Termination phase: Preprocessing 3
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (22223)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (22224)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (22222)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.37 % (22222)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37 % (22222)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37 % (22222)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.37 % (22222)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.37
% 0.15/0.37 % (22222)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (22222)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (22222)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (22222)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22222)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22226)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22220)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.38 % (22221)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.38
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22225)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38 % (22218)Success in time 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.38 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------