TSTP Solution File: NUM664_8 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : NUM664_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:15:24 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 8 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 6 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 10 ~; 8 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 10 !; 0 ?; 10 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
nat: $tType ).
tff(decl_22,type,
x: nat ).
tff(decl_23,type,
y: nat ).
tff(decl_24,type,
z: nat ).
tff(decl_25,type,
less: ( nat * nat ) > $o ).
tff(k,axiom,
( ~ less(y,z)
=> ( y = z ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',k) ).
tff(satz16b,conjecture,
less(x,z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz16b) ).
tff(satz15,axiom,
! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat] :
( less(X2,X3)
=> ( less(X3,X4)
=> less(X2,X4) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz15) ).
tff(l,axiom,
less(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l) ).
tff(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ less(y,z)
=> ( y = z ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[k]) ).
tff(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ less(x,z),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz16b])]) ).
tff(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5: nat,X6: nat,X7: nat] :
( ~ less(X5,X6)
| ~ less(X6,X7)
| less(X5,X7) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz15])])]) ).
tff(c_0_7,plain,
( less(y,z)
| ( y = z ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
tff(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ less(x,z),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
tcf(c_0_9,plain,
! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat] :
( less(X2,X4)
| ~ less(X2,X3)
| ~ less(X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
tcf(c_0_10,plain,
( less(y,z)
| ( y = z ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
tcf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ less(x,z),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
tcf(c_0_12,plain,
! [X2: nat] :
( ( z = y )
| less(X2,z)
| ~ less(X2,y) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
tcf(c_0_13,plain,
less(x,y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[l]) ).
tcf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
z = y,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : NUM664_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 04:07:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # new_bool_1 with pid 22786 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 22792 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.51 # Search class: FGUSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 10
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Processed clauses : 11
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.21/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.21/0.51 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.21/0.51 # ...of those cached : 5
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 261
% 0.21/0.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 30
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1600 pages
% 0.21/0.51
% 0.21/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.21/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------