TSTP Solution File: NUM652_8 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : NUM652_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:44:14 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.56s 0.73s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 9 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 15 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 71 ( 41 ~; 10 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 16 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 2 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 15 !; 0 ?; 15 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
nat: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
x: nat ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
y: nat ).
tff(pred_def_1,type,
more: ( nat * nat ) > $o ).
tff(pred_def_2,type,
less: ( nat * nat ) > $o ).
tff(f28,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f26,f21]) ).
tff(f21,plain,
! [X1: nat] : ~ less(X1,X1),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f20]) ).
tff(f20,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
( ( X0 != X1 )
| ~ less(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
tff(f15,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
( ( ( X0 != X1 )
| ~ less(X0,X1) )
& ( ~ less(X0,X1)
| ~ more(X0,X1) )
& ( ~ more(X0,X1)
| ( X0 != X1 ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).
tff(f14,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
( ( ( X0 != X1 )
| ~ less(X0,X1) )
& ( ~ less(X0,X1)
| ~ more(X0,X1) )
& ( ~ more(X0,X1)
| ( X0 != X1 ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
tff(f12,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
=> ~ more(X0,X1) )
=> ( ( more(X0,X1)
=> ~ less(X0,X1) )
=> ~ ( less(X0,X1)
=> ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f11]) ).
tff(f11,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
=> ~ more(X0,X1) )
=> ~ ~ ( ( more(X0,X1)
=> ~ less(X0,X1) )
=> ~ ( less(X0,X1)
=> ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).
tff(f3,axiom,
! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
~ ( ( ( X1 = X2 )
=> ~ more(X1,X2) )
=> ~ ~ ( ( more(X1,X2)
=> ~ less(X1,X2) )
=> ~ ( less(X1,X2)
=> ( X1 != X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz10b) ).
tff(f26,plain,
less(x,x),
inference(superposition,[],[f16,f24]) ).
tff(f24,plain,
x = y,
inference(resolution,[],[f23,f17]) ).
tff(f17,plain,
( more(x,y)
| ( x = y ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
tff(f13,plain,
( ( x = y )
| more(x,y) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tff(f1,axiom,
( ~ more(x,y)
=> ( x = y ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m) ).
tff(f23,plain,
~ more(x,y),
inference(resolution,[],[f16,f19]) ).
tff(f19,plain,
! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
( ~ less(X0,X1)
| ~ more(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).
tff(f16,plain,
less(x,y),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
tff(f10,plain,
less(x,y),
inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).
tff(f5,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ less(x,y),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4]) ).
tff(f4,conjecture,
~ less(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz10c) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : NUM652_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 03:51:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 This is a TX0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.73 % (13984)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13986)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13985)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13987)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13989)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13988)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13990)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13984)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (13984)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.73 % (13984)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13988)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (13988)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.73 % (13988)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13984)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.73
% 0.56/0.73 % (13984)Memory used [KB]: 953
% 0.56/0.73 % (13984)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.73 % (13984)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13988)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.73
% 0.56/0.73 % (13988)Memory used [KB]: 952
% 0.56/0.73 % (13988)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.73 % (13988)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.56/0.73 % (13989)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.73 % (13984)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.73 % (13984)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.73 % (13990)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.73 % (13987)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.73 % (13985)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.73 % (13988)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.73 % (13988)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.73 % (13986)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.73 % (13989)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-13846"
% 0.56/0.73 % (13989)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.73 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.73 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.74 % (13989)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74 % (13989)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.74 % (13989)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.74
% 0.56/0.74 % (13989)Memory used [KB]: 959
% 0.56/0.74 % (13989)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.74 % (13989)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.56/0.74 % (13846)Success in time 0.372 s
% 0.56/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------