TSTP Solution File: NUM638^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : NUM638^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:43:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   22
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   69 (   4 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  237 ( 150 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  295 (  66   ~;  78   |;  10   &; 117   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   15 (  12 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (  24   ^  35   !;   6   ?;  66   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    n_1: nat ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    suc: nat > nat ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    some: ( nat > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    sK0: nat ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    sK1: nat ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    sK4: nat > nat ).

thf(f78,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f32,f37,f42,f68,f77]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f76]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f75,f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ( sK1 = sK0 ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_4])]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    ( ( sK1 = sK0 )
    | ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( ( sK1 = sK0 )
    | ( x != x )
    | ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f70,f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( x
      = ( suc @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ( x
      = ( suc @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( x
         != ( suc @ X0 ) )
        | ( sK0 = X0 ) )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f19,f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( x
      = ( suc @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ( x
      = ( suc @ sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( suc @ X0 )
       != ( suc @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ( ( suc @ X0 )
       != ( suc @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( suc @ X0 )
        = ( suc @ X1 ) )
     => ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax4) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    spl2_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f67]) ).

thf(f67,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f66,f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    x != n_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    x != n_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( ( x = n_1 )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f65]) ).

thf(f65,plain,
    ( ( x != x )
    | ( x = n_1 )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( x != x )
    | ( x = n_1 )
    | ( x != x )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f51,f61]) ).

thf(f61,plain,
    ( ( x
      = ( suc @ ( sK4 @ x ) ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f60,f18]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( x
      = ( suc @ ( sK4 @ x ) ) )
    | ( x = n_1 )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f59]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( x != X0 )
        | ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
          = X0 )
        | ( n_1 = X0 ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f58]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( n_1 = X0 )
        | ( x != X0 )
        | ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
          = X0 )
        | ( x != x ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f54]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
          = X0 )
        | ( n_1 = X0 )
        | ( x != X0 )
        | ( x != x )
        | ( n_1 = X0 ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f51,f53]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( x
          = ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) )
        | ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
          = X0 )
        | ( n_1 = X0 ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( n_1 = X0 )
        | ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
          = X0 )
        | ( $true
          = ( x
            = ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) ) ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f48]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( n_1 = X0 )
        | ( $true
          = ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
            = X0 ) )
        | ( $true
          = ( x
            = ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) ) ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( ( x
            = ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) )
         != ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
            = X0 ) )
        | ( n_1 = X0 ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( ( ^ [Y0: nat] :
                ( ( suc @ Y0 )
                = X0 )
            @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
         != ( ^ [Y0: nat] :
                ( x
                = ( suc @ Y0 ) )
            @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) )
        | ( n_1 = X0 ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( ( ^ [Y0: nat] :
                ( x
                = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) )
         != ( ^ [Y0: nat] :
                ( ( suc @ Y0 )
                = X0 ) ) )
        | ( n_1 = X0 ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f44]) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( $true != $true )
        | ( n_1 = X0 )
        | ( ( ^ [Y0: nat] :
                ( x
                = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) )
         != ( ^ [Y0: nat] :
                ( ( suc @ Y0 )
                = X0 ) ) ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f31,f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( some
          @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
              ( ( suc @ Y0 )
              = X0 ) ) )
      | ( n_1 = X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( n_1 = X0 )
      | ( $true
        = ( some
          @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
              ( ( suc @ Y0 )
              = X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( n_1 != X0 )
     => ( $true
        = ( some
          @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
              ( ( suc @ Y0 )
              = X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( n_1 != X0 )
     => ( some
        @ ^ [X1: nat] :
            ( ( suc @ X1 )
            = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( n_1 != X0 )
     => ( some
        @ ^ [X2: nat] :
            ( ( suc @ X2 )
            = X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz3) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( x
            = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ( $true
      = ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( x
            = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( x
         != ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) )
        | ( n_1 = X0 )
        | ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
         != X0 ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
            = X0 )
          = $false )
        | ( n_1 = X0 )
        | ( x
         != ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f49]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( ( x
            = ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) ) )
          = $false )
        | ( n_1 = X0 )
        | ( ( ( suc @ ( sK4 @ X0 ) )
            = X0 )
          = $false ) )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f20,f29,f39]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | ( $true
     != ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( x
            = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( x
            = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ( ( x
        = ( suc @ sK0 ) )
      & ( x
        = ( suc @ sK1 ) )
      & ( sK1 != sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f14,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ? [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
        ( ( x
          = ( suc @ X0 ) )
        & ( x
          = ( suc @ X1 ) )
        & ( X0 != X1 ) )
   => ( ( x
        = ( suc @ sK0 ) )
      & ( x
        = ( suc @ sK1 ) )
      & ( sK1 != sK0 ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( x
            = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ? [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
        ( ( x
          = ( suc @ X0 ) )
        & ( x
          = ( suc @ X1 ) )
        & ( X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $true
     != ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( x
            = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    | ? [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
        & ( x
          = ( suc @ X0 ) )
        & ( x
          = ( suc @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
        ( ( x
          = ( suc @ X1 ) )
       => ( ( x
            = ( suc @ X0 ) )
         => ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
   => ( $true
     != ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( x
            = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ~ ~ ( ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
            ( ( x
              = ( suc @ X1 ) )
           => ( ( x
                = ( suc @ X0 ) )
             => ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
       => ( $true
         != ( some
            @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
                ( x
                = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ~ ( ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
            ( ( x
              = ( suc @ X1 ) )
           => ( ( x
                = ( suc @ X0 ) )
             => ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
       => ~ ( some
            @ ^ [X2: nat] :
                ( x
                = ( suc @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( ! [X1: nat,X3: nat] :
            ( ( x
              = ( suc @ X3 ) )
           => ( ( x
                = ( suc @ X1 ) )
             => ( X1 = X3 ) ) )
       => ~ ( some
            @ ^ [X2: nat] :
                ( x
                = ( suc @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X1: nat,X3: nat] :
          ( ( x
            = ( suc @ X3 ) )
         => ( ( x
              = ( suc @ X1 ) )
           => ( X1 = X3 ) ) )
     => ~ ( some
          @ ^ [X2: nat] :
              ( x
              = ( suc @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz3a) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f21,f34,f29]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( x
      = ( suc @ sK1 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( x
            = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f29,f25]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( x
      = ( suc @ sK0 ) )
    | ( $true
     != ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( x
            = ( suc @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : NUM638^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 07:29:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.35  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (10221)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10217)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10223)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10220)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10222)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10219)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10218)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10225)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10224)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10223)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37  % (10223)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.38  % (10223)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (10223)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.38  % (10223)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % (10223)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.38  % (10223)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.38  % (10223)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.14/0.38  % (10223)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (10223)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (10214)Success in time 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.38  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------