TSTP Solution File: NUM635^1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : NUM635^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.x4Xoc4q9gm true
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:42:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.05s 0.77s
% Output : Refutation 1.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 7 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 20 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 0 &; 23 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 1 ( 1 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 3 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% ( 3 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 3 ^; 10 !; 0 ?; 13 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nat_type,type,
nat: $tType ).
thf(y_type,type,
y: nat ).
thf(suc_type,type,
suc: nat > nat ).
thf(x_type,type,
x: nat ).
thf(satz1,conjecture,
( ( suc @ x )
!= ( suc @ y ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
( ( suc @ x )
= ( suc @ y ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[satz1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
( ( suc @ x )
= ( suc @ y ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(ax4,axiom,
! [Xx: nat,Xy: nat] :
( ( ( suc @ Xx )
= ( suc @ Xy ) )
=> ( Xx = Xy ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: nat] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: nat] :
( ( ( suc @ Y0 )
= ( suc @ Y1 ) )
=> ( Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
! [X2: nat] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: nat] :
( ( ( suc @ X2 )
= ( suc @ Y0 ) )
=> ( X2 = Y0 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
! [X2: nat,X4: nat] :
( ( ( suc @ X2 )
= ( suc @ X4 ) )
=> ( X2 = X4 ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
! [X2: nat,X4: nat] :
( ( ( suc @ X2 )
!= ( suc @ X4 ) )
| ( X2 = X4 ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_imply,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
! [X2: nat,X4: nat] :
( ( ( suc @ X2 )
!= ( suc @ X4 ) )
| ( X2 = X4 ) ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7,plain,
! [X0: nat] :
( ( ( suc @ X0 )
!= ( suc @ x ) )
| ( X0 = y ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl2,zip_derived_cl6]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
x = y,
inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl7]) ).
thf(n,axiom,
x != y ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
x != y,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[n]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl17,plain,
$false,
inference('simplify_reflect-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl14,zip_derived_cl0]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : NUM635^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.x4Xoc4q9gm true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 15:03:17 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.22/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.22/0.36 % Running in HO mode
% 0.22/0.68 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.22/0.68 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.22/0.68 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.22/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.22/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 1.05/0.77 % Solved by lams/35_full_unif4.sh.
% 1.05/0.77 % done 3 iterations in 0.006s
% 1.05/0.77 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.05/0.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.05/0.77
% 1.05/0.77
% 1.05/0.77 % Terminating...
% 1.56/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.56/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------