TSTP Solution File: NUM634+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUM634+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:38:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.05s 2.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    5 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   4 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_158,hypothesis,
    xK = sz00,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zo3xuwo5/lgb.p',i_0_158) ).

cnf(i_0_157,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-zo3xuwo5/lgb.p',i_0_157) ).

cnf(c_0_161,hypothesis,
    xK = sz00,
    i_0_158 ).

cnf(c_0_162,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    i_0_157 ).

cnf(c_0_163,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_161,c_0_162]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : NUM634+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 05:04:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.05/2.36  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.05/2.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.05/2.36  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.05/2.36  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S4S
% 8.05/2.36  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 8.05/2.36  #
% 8.05/2.36  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 8.05/2.36  
% 8.05/2.36  # Proof found!
% 8.05/2.36  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.05/2.36  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.05/2.36  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.05/2.36  
% 8.05/2.36  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.05/2.36  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 8.05/2.36  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 8.05/2.36  # Total time               : 0.031 s
% 8.05/2.36  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.05/2.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------