TSTP Solution File: NUM634+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : NUM634+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:55:50 EDT 2024
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 6 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__3462,hypothesis,
xK != sz00,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YxJJX7OM4D/E---3.1_14524.p',m__3462) ).
fof(m__3520,hypothesis,
~ ( xK != sz00 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YxJJX7OM4D/E---3.1_14524.p',m__3520) ).
fof(c_0_2,hypothesis,
xK != sz00,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__3462]) ).
fof(c_0_3,hypothesis,
xK != sz00,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
xK = sz00,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__3520]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
xK != sz00,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
xK = sz00,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : NUM634+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Fri May 3 09:56:50 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YxJJX7OM4D/E---3.1_14524.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # new_bool_3 with pid 14603 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 14606 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 80
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 136
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 129
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 126
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 520
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10777
% 0.15/0.42 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2873
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2300 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------