TSTP Solution File: NUM618+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : NUM618+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:50:13 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 7.31s 1.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 42 ( 17 ~; 10 |; 13 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f97,axiom,
! [X0] :
( aElementOf0(X0,xO)
=> ? [X1] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = X0
& aElementOf0(X1,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__4982) ).
fof(f114,axiom,
( aElementOf0(xx,xO)
& aElementOf0(xx,szNzAzT0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__5365) ).
fof(f115,conjecture,
? [X0] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X0) = xx
& aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(f116,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X0] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X0) = xx
& aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f115]) ).
fof(f246,plain,
! [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = X0
& aElementOf0(X1,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) )
| ~ aElementOf0(X0,xO) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f247,plain,
! [X0] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X0) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f337,plain,
! [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = X0
& aElementOf0(X1,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) )
=> ( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,sK28(X0)) = X0
& aElementOf0(sK28(X0),sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& aElementOf0(sK28(X0),szNzAzT0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f338,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,sK28(X0)) = X0
& aElementOf0(sK28(X0),sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& aElementOf0(sK28(X0),szNzAzT0) )
| ~ aElementOf0(X0,xO) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK28])],[f246,f337]) ).
fof(f534,plain,
! [X0] :
( aElementOf0(sK28(X0),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X0,xO) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
fof(f536,plain,
! [X0] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,sK28(X0)) = X0
| ~ aElementOf0(X0,xO) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f338]) ).
fof(f558,plain,
aElementOf0(xx,xO),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f114]) ).
fof(f559,plain,
! [X0] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X0) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f247]) ).
cnf(c_244,plain,
( ~ aElementOf0(X0,xO)
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,sK28(X0)) = X0 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f536]) ).
cnf(c_246,plain,
( ~ aElementOf0(X0,xO)
| aElementOf0(sK28(X0),szNzAzT0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f534]) ).
cnf(c_267,plain,
aElementOf0(xx,xO),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f558]) ).
cnf(c_269,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X0) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f559]) ).
cnf(c_15309,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X0) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_269]) ).
cnf(c_19057,plain,
sdtlpdtrp0(xe,sK28(xx)) = xx,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_267,c_244]) ).
cnf(c_19095,plain,
~ aElementOf0(sK28(xx),szNzAzT0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_19057,c_15309]) ).
cnf(c_19096,plain,
~ aElementOf0(xx,xO),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_19095]) ).
cnf(c_19097,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_19096,c_267]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : NUM618+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Thu May 2 19:54:21 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 7.31/1.62 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 7.31/1.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 ------ iProver source info
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 7.31/1.62 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 7.31/1.62 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Parsing...
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 3 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Proving...
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Problem Properties
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 clauses 216
% 7.31/1.62 conjectures 1
% 7.31/1.62 EPR 56
% 7.31/1.62 Horn 177
% 7.31/1.62 unary 57
% 7.31/1.62 binary 33
% 7.31/1.62 lits 672
% 7.31/1.62 lits eq 110
% 7.31/1.62 fd_pure 0
% 7.31/1.62 fd_pseudo 0
% 7.31/1.62 fd_cond 10
% 7.31/1.62 fd_pseudo_cond 25
% 7.31/1.62 AC symbols 0
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 ------
% 7.31/1.62 Current options:
% 7.31/1.62 ------
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 ------ Proving...
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.31/1.62
% 7.31/1.62
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------