TSTP Solution File: NUM618+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : NUM618+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:27:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 11 ~; 7 |; 7 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn 3 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& xx = sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(m__4982,hypothesis,
! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xO)
=> ? [X2] :
( aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
& aElementOf0(X2,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__4982) ).
fof(m__5365,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(xx,szNzAzT0)
& aElementOf0(xx,xO) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__5365) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& xx = sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X209] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X209,szNzAzT0)
| xx != sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X209) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
! [X207] :
( ( aElementOf0(esk25_1(X207),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X207,xO) )
& ( aElementOf0(esk25_1(X207),sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X207,xO) )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk25_1(X207)) = X207
| ~ aElementOf0(X207,xO) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__4982])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
| xx != sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk25_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,xO),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5365]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ aElementOf0(esk25_1(xx),szNzAzT0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk25_1(X1),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : NUM618+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.38 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38 % DateTime : Mon May 20 05:38:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.54 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.23/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 27615 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.23/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.54 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 27622 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.23/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.54 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 115
% 0.23/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Initial clauses : 222
% 0.23/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.23/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 215
% 0.23/0.54 # Processed clauses : 376
% 0.23/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.23/0.54 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.23/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 368
% 0.23/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 47
% 0.23/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.23/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.23/0.54 # Generated clauses : 120
% 0.23/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 93
% 0.23/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 16
% 0.23/0.54 # Paramodulations : 78
% 0.23/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 47
% 0.23/0.54 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 102
% 0.23/0.54 # ...of those cached : 72
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 112
% 0.23/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 62
% 0.23/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 38
% 0.23/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 141
% 0.23/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 573
% 0.23/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 216
% 0.23/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7622
% 0.23/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1706
% 0.23/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.23/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 264
% 0.23/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.23/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.23/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 19454
% 0.23/0.54 # Search garbage collected termcells : 3750
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54 # User time : 0.035 s
% 0.23/0.54 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Total time : 0.040 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2464 pages
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54 # User time : 0.137 s
% 0.23/0.54 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Total time : 0.157 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1832 pages
% 0.23/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------