TSTP Solution File: NUM594+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM594+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:37:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.00s 3.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 6 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4221,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk38_0,szDzozmdt0(xd)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xbuy6ne2/lgb.p',i_0_4221) ).
cnf(i_0_4213,hypothesis,
szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xbuy6ne2/lgb.p',i_0_4213) ).
cnf(i_0_4222,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X1) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xbuy6ne2/lgb.p',i_0_4222) ).
cnf(i_0_4220,hypothesis,
sdtlpdtrp0(xd,esk38_0) = xx,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xbuy6ne2/lgb.p',i_0_4220) ).
cnf(c_0_4227,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk38_0,szDzozmdt0(xd)),
i_0_4221 ).
cnf(c_0_4228,hypothesis,
szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0,
i_0_4213 ).
cnf(c_0_4229,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X1) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
i_0_4222 ).
cnf(c_0_4230,hypothesis,
sdtlpdtrp0(xd,esk38_0) = xx,
i_0_4220 ).
cnf(c_0_4231,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk38_0,szNzAzT0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4227,c_0_4228]) ).
cnf(c_0_4232,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4229,c_0_4230]),c_0_4231])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.12 % Problem : NUM594+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.05/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 14:24:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 9.00/3.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.00/3.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.00/3.44 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.00/3.44 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 9.00/3.44 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.00/3.44 #
% 9.00/3.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 9.00/3.44
% 9.00/3.44 # Proof found!
% 9.00/3.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.00/3.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.00/3.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.00/3.44
% 9.00/3.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.00/3.44 # User time : 0.028 s
% 9.00/3.44 # System time : 0.004 s
% 9.00/3.44 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 9.00/3.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 9.00/3.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------