TSTP Solution File: NUM594+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM594+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:34:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  104 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   39 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  138 (  59   ~;  56   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   2 sgn  19   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
      & sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X1) = xx ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(mDefSImg,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aFunction0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( X3 = sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X2)
            <=> ( aSet0(X3)
                & ! [X4] :
                    ( aElementOf0(X4,X3)
                  <=> ? [X5] :
                        ( aElementOf0(X5,X2)
                        & sdtlpdtrp0(X1,X5) = X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',mDefSImg) ).

fof(m__4730,hypothesis,
    ( aFunction0(xd)
    & szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0
    & ! [X1] :
        ( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ( aSet0(X2)
              & aElementOf0(X2,slbdtsldtrb0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X1)),xk)) )
           => sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X1) = sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X1),X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',m__4730) ).

fof(m__4781,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,sdtlcdtrc0(xd,szDzozmdt0(xd))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',m__4781) ).

fof(mSubRefl,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => aSubsetOf0(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',mSubRefl) ).

fof(mNATSet,axiom,
    ( aSet0(szNzAzT0)
    & isCountable0(szNzAzT0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',mNATSet) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
        ( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
        & sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X1) = xx ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
      | sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X2) != xx ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X9,X11,X8,X13] :
      ( ( aSet0(X8)
        | X8 != sdtlcdtrc0(X6,X7)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X7,szDzozmdt0(X6))
        | ~ aFunction0(X6) )
      & ( aElementOf0(esk14_4(X6,X7,X8,X9),X7)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X9,X8)
        | X8 != sdtlcdtrc0(X6,X7)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X7,szDzozmdt0(X6))
        | ~ aFunction0(X6) )
      & ( sdtlpdtrp0(X6,esk14_4(X6,X7,X8,X9)) = X9
        | ~ aElementOf0(X9,X8)
        | X8 != sdtlcdtrc0(X6,X7)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X7,szDzozmdt0(X6))
        | ~ aFunction0(X6) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X11,X7)
        | sdtlpdtrp0(X6,X11) != X9
        | aElementOf0(X9,X8)
        | X8 != sdtlcdtrc0(X6,X7)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X7,szDzozmdt0(X6))
        | ~ aFunction0(X6) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(esk15_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X13,X7)
        | sdtlpdtrp0(X6,X13) != esk15_3(X6,X7,X8)
        | ~ aSet0(X8)
        | X8 = sdtlcdtrc0(X6,X7)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X7,szDzozmdt0(X6))
        | ~ aFunction0(X6) )
      & ( aElementOf0(esk16_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
        | aElementOf0(esk15_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | ~ aSet0(X8)
        | X8 = sdtlcdtrc0(X6,X7)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X7,szDzozmdt0(X6))
        | ~ aFunction0(X6) )
      & ( sdtlpdtrp0(X6,esk16_3(X6,X7,X8)) = esk15_3(X6,X7,X8)
        | aElementOf0(esk15_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | ~ aSet0(X8)
        | X8 = sdtlcdtrc0(X6,X7)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X7,szDzozmdt0(X6))
        | ~ aFunction0(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSImg])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( aFunction0(xd)
      & szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X3,szNzAzT0)
        | ~ aSet0(X4)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X4,slbdtsldtrb0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X3)),xk))
        | sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X3) = sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X3),X4) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__4730])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X1) != xx
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( sdtlpdtrp0(X1,esk14_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)) = X4
    | ~ aFunction0(X1)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X1))
    | X3 != sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    aFunction0(xd),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != sdtlcdtrc0(xd,X2)
    | X3 != xx
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aElementOf0(esk14_4(xd,X2,X1,X3),szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( aElementOf0(esk14_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
    | ~ aFunction0(X1)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X1))
    | X3 != sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != sdtlcdtrc0(xd,szNzAzT0)
    | X2 != xx
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(szNzAzT0,szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,sdtlcdtrc0(xd,szDzozmdt0(xd))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4781]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != xx
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(szNzAzT0,szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,sdtlcdtrc0(xd,szNzAzT0)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,sdtlcdtrc0(xd,szNzAzT0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X2)
      | aSubsetOf0(X2,X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSubRefl])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(szNzAzT0,szNzAzT0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( aSubsetOf0(X1,X1)
    | ~ aSet0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    aSet0(szNzAzT0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mNATSet]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : NUM594+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 10:48:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/1.43  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 0.25/1.43  
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 0.25/1.43  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 0.25/1.43  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 95
% 0.25/1.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Initial clauses                      : 192
% 0.25/1.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.25/1.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 185
% 0.25/1.43  # Processed clauses                    : 2679
% 0.25/1.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 39
% 0.25/1.43  # ...subsumed                          : 1382
% 0.25/1.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1258
% 0.25/1.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 23
% 0.25/1.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 76
% 0.25/1.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.25/1.43  # Generated clauses                    : 13761
% 0.25/1.43  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 12872
% 0.25/1.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1103
% 0.25/1.43  # Paramodulations                      : 13654
% 0.25/1.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 107
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1163
% 0.25/1.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 83
% 0.25/1.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 44
% 0.25/1.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1036
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9860
% 0.25/1.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 63727
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 92
% 0.25/1.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 270904
% 0.25/1.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 66047
% 0.25/1.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1812
% 0.25/1.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8379
% 0.25/1.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 10
% 0.25/1.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.25/1.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/1.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 313443
% 0.25/1.43  
% 0.25/1.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43  # User time                : 0.454 s
% 0.25/1.43  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.25/1.43  # Total time               : 0.468 s
% 0.25/1.43  # Maximum resident set size: 16584 pages
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------