TSTP Solution File: NUM550+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM550+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:33:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  19   ~;  13   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   1 sgn   6   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    xQ != slcrc0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).

fof(mDefEmp,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = slcrc0
    <=> ( aSet0(X1)
        & ~ ? [X2] : aElementOf0(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mDefEmp) ).

fof(mCardEmpty,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ( sbrdtbr0(X1) = sz00
      <=> X1 = slcrc0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mCardEmpty) ).

fof(m__2291,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xQ)
    & isFinite0(xQ)
    & sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__2291) ).

fof(m__2202_02,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xS)
    & aSet0(xT)
    & xk != sz00 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__2202_02) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( xQ != slcrc0 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3] :
      ( ( aSet0(X3)
        | X3 != slcrc0 )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3)
        | X3 != slcrc0 )
      & ( ~ aSet0(X3)
        | aElementOf0(esk2_1(X3),X3)
        | X3 = slcrc0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefEmp])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    xQ = slcrc0,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( sbrdtbr0(X2) != sz00
        | X2 = slcrc0
        | ~ aSet0(X2) )
      & ( X2 != slcrc0
        | sbrdtbr0(X2) = sz00
        | ~ aSet0(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mCardEmpty])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( aSet0(X1)
    | X1 != slcrc0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    xQ = slcrc0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( sbrdtbr0(X1) = sz00
    | ~ aSet0(X1)
    | X1 != slcrc0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( aSet0(X1)
    | X1 != xQ ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2291]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( sbrdtbr0(X1) = sz00
    | X1 != xQ ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    xk != sz00,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2202_02]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : NUM550+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 19:44:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.021 s
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 17
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 8
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 67
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 111
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 106
% 0.24/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 25
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 0.24/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 11
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 9
% 0.24/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 11
% 0.24/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 24
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 14
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.24/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 8
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 90
% 0.24/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 366
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.24/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7168
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42  # User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.24/1.42  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 3252 pages
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------