TSTP Solution File: NUM538+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : NUM538+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:19:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.84s 8.95s
% Output   : Refutation 7.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/1.04  % Problem  : NUM538+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/1.04  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.17/1.27  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.17/1.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/1.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/1.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/1.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/1.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/1.27  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.17/1.27  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 01:46:00 EDT 2022
% 0.17/1.27  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/1.29  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.17/1.29  The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.17/1.29  Thu Jul  7 01:46:00 2022
% 0.17/1.29  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 25722.
% 0.17/1.29  
% 0.17/1.29  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.17/1.29  set(auto).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.17/1.29  clear(print_given).
% 0.17/1.29  
% 0.17/1.29  formula_list(usable).
% 0.17/1.29  
% 0.17/1.29  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.17/1.29  
% 0.17/1.29  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.17/1.29  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.17/1.29  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.17/1.29  clauses in usable.
% 0.17/1.29  
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.17/1.29     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.17/1.29  
% 0.17/1.29  ------------> process usable:
% 0.17/1.29  76 back subsumes 75.
% 0.17/1.29  
% 0.17/1.29  ------------> process sos:
% 0.17/1.29    Following clause subsumed by 89 during input processing: 0 [copy,89,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.17/1.29  89 back subsumes 80.
% 0.17/1.29  89 back subsumes 78.
% 0.17/1.29  89 back subsumes 74.
% 0.17/1.29  89 back subsumes 68.
% 0.17/1.29  
% 0.17/1.29  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/1.54  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/1.54  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/1.54  number of clauses in intial UL: 73
% 0.20/1.54  number of clauses initially in problem: 82
% 0.20/1.54  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 89
% 0.20/1.54  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/1.54  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/1.54  absolute distinct symbol count: 23
% 0.20/1.54     distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.20/1.54     distinct function count: 9
% 0.20/1.54     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  
% 0.20/1.54  =========== start of search ===========
% 3.00/4.10  
% 3.00/4.10  
% 3.00/4.10  Changing weight limit from 60 to 38.
% 3.00/4.10  
% 3.00/4.10  Resetting weight limit to 38 after 45 givens.
% 3.00/4.10  
% 3.29/4.40  
% 3.29/4.40  
% 3.29/4.40  Changing weight limit from 38 to 36.
% 3.29/4.40  
% 3.29/4.40  Resetting weight limit to 36 after 50 givens.
% 3.29/4.40  
% 4.00/5.13  
% 4.00/5.13  
% 4.00/5.13  Changing weight limit from 36 to 32.
% 4.00/5.13  
% 4.00/5.13  Resetting weight limit to 32 after 55 givens.
% 4.00/5.13  
% 4.24/5.41  
% 4.24/5.41  
% 4.24/5.41  Changing weight limit from 32 to 30.
% 4.24/5.41  
% 4.24/5.41  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 60 givens.
% 4.24/5.41  
% 4.51/5.63  
% 4.51/5.63  
% 4.51/5.63  Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 4.51/5.63  
% 4.51/5.63  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 65 givens.
% 4.51/5.63  
% 4.82/5.93  
% 4.82/5.93  
% 4.82/5.93  Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 4.82/5.93  
% 4.82/5.93  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 70 givens.
% 4.82/5.93  
% 4.91/6.03  
% 4.91/6.03  
% 4.91/6.03  Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 4.91/6.03  
% 4.91/6.03  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 75 givens.
% 4.91/6.03  
% 5.30/6.47  
% 5.30/6.47  
% 5.30/6.47  Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 5.30/6.47  
% 5.30/6.47  Resetting weight limit to 26 after 80 givens.
% 5.30/6.47  
% 5.68/6.82  
% 5.68/6.82  
% 5.68/6.82  Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 5.68/6.82  
% 5.68/6.82  Resetting weight limit to 25 after 85 givens.
% 5.68/6.82  
% 6.21/7.32  
% 6.21/7.32  
% 6.21/7.32  Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 6.21/7.32  
% 6.21/7.32  Resetting weight limit to 24 after 95 givens.
% 6.21/7.32  
% 6.58/7.72  
% 6.58/7.72  
% 6.58/7.72  Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 6.58/7.72  
% 6.58/7.72  Resetting weight limit to 23 after 100 givens.
% 6.58/7.72  
% 6.88/8.00  
% 6.88/8.00  
% 6.88/8.00  Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 6.88/8.00  
% 6.88/8.00  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 105 givens.
% 6.88/8.00  
% 7.14/8.25  
% 7.14/8.25  
% 7.14/8.25  Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 7.14/8.25  
% 7.14/8.25  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 110 givens.
% 7.14/8.25  
% 7.67/8.85  
% 7.67/8.85  
% 7.67/8.85  Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 7.67/8.85  
% 7.67/8.85  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 120 givens.
% 7.67/8.85  
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 7.84/8.95  % SZS status Theorem
% 7.84/8.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   7.62 sec ----> 13707 [hyper,2391,65,89] {-} $F.
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 7.84/8.95  % SZS status Theorem
% 7.84/8.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  1 [] {+} -aSet0(A)| -aElementOf0(B,A)|aElement0(B).
% 7.84/8.95  33 [] {+} -aSet0(A)| -aElementOf0(B,A)|sdtpldt0(sdtmndt0(A,B),B)=A.
% 7.84/8.95  38 [] {+} -aElement0(A)| -aSet0(B)| -isFinite0(B)|isFinite0(sdtmndt0(B,A)).
% 7.84/8.95  62 [] {+} -aSet0(A)| -isFinite0(A)| -aElement0(B)|aElementOf0(B,A)|sbrdtbr0(sdtpldt0(A,B))=szszuzczcdt0(sbrdtbr0(A)).
% 7.84/8.95  65 [] {+} -aElementOf0(A,sdtmndt0(xS,xx))|A!=xx.
% 7.84/8.95  67 [] {+} szszuzczcdt0(sbrdtbr0(sdtmndt0(xS,xx)))!=sbrdtbr0(xS).
% 7.84/8.95  85 [] {-} aSet0(xS).
% 7.84/8.95  86 [] {-} isFinite0(xS).
% 7.84/8.95  87 [] {-} aElementOf0(xx,xS).
% 7.84/8.95  88 [] {-} aSet0(sdtmndt0(xS,xx)).
% 7.84/8.95  89 [] {-} A=A.
% 7.84/8.95  299,298 [hyper,87,33,85] {-} sdtpldt0(sdtmndt0(xS,xx),xx)=xS.
% 7.84/8.95  300 [hyper,87,1,85] {-} aElement0(xx).
% 7.84/8.95  353 [hyper,300,38,85,86] {-} isFinite0(sdtmndt0(xS,xx)).
% 7.84/8.95  2391 [hyper,353,62,88,300,demod,299,unit_del,67] {-} aElementOf0(xx,sdtmndt0(xS,xx)).
% 7.84/8.95  13707 [hyper,2391,65,89] {-} $F.
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.84/8.95  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  ============ end of search ============
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 7.84/8.95  
% 7.84/8.95  Process 25722 finished Thu Jul  7 01:46:07 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------