TSTP Solution File: NUM533+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM533+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:52:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.67s 1.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   7 unt;  12 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   80 (  35   ~;  37   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   8   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (;  23   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ aSubsetOf0 > aElementOf0 > isFinite0 > isCountable0 > aSet0 > aElement0 > #nlpp > xC > xB > xA > slcrc0 > #skF_1 > #skF_2

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(aSet0,type,
    aSet0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(aElement0,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

tff(xB,type,
    xB: $i ).

tff(aSubsetOf0,type,
    aSubsetOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(isCountable0,type,
    isCountable0: $i > $o ).

tff(aElementOf0,type,
    aElementOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(xC,type,
    xC: $i ).

tff(slcrc0,type,
    slcrc0: $i ).

tff(isFinite0,type,
    isFinite0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xA,type,
    xA: $i ).

tff(f_112,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xA)
    & aSet0(xB)
    & aSet0(xC) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__522) ).

tff(f_118,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( aSubsetOf0(xA,xB)
        & aSubsetOf0(xB,xC) )
     => aSubsetOf0(xA,xC) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(f_84,definition,
    ! [W0] :
      ( aSet0(W0)
     => ! [W1] :
          ( aSubsetOf0(W1,W0)
        <=> ( aSet0(W1)
            & ! [W2] :
                ( aElementOf0(W2,W1)
               => aElementOf0(W2,W0) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSub) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    aSet0(xA),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    aSubsetOf0(xA,xB),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_118]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    aSet0(xC),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    aSet0(xB),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    aSubsetOf0(xB,xC),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_118]) ).

tff(c_116,plain,
    ! [W0_46,W1_47] :
      ( aElementOf0('#skF_2'(W0_46,W1_47),W1_47)
      | aSubsetOf0(W1_47,W0_46)
      | ~ aSet0(W1_47)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_46) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [W2_23,W0_14,W1_20] :
      ( aElementOf0(W2_23,W0_14)
      | ~ aElementOf0(W2_23,W1_20)
      | ~ aSubsetOf0(W1_20,W0_14)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_202,plain,
    ! [W0_56,W1_57,W0_58] :
      ( aElementOf0('#skF_2'(W0_56,W1_57),W0_58)
      | ~ aSubsetOf0(W1_57,W0_58)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_58)
      | aSubsetOf0(W1_57,W0_56)
      | ~ aSet0(W1_57)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_56) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_24]) ).

tff(c_254,plain,
    ! [W0_64,W1_65,W0_66,W0_67] :
      ( aElementOf0('#skF_2'(W0_64,W1_65),W0_66)
      | ~ aSubsetOf0(W0_67,W0_66)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_66)
      | ~ aSubsetOf0(W1_65,W0_67)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_67)
      | aSubsetOf0(W1_65,W0_64)
      | ~ aSet0(W1_65)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_64) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_202,c_24]) ).

tff(c_262,plain,
    ! [W0_64,W1_65] :
      ( aElementOf0('#skF_2'(W0_64,W1_65),xC)
      | ~ aSet0(xC)
      | ~ aSubsetOf0(W1_65,xB)
      | ~ aSet0(xB)
      | aSubsetOf0(W1_65,W0_64)
      | ~ aSet0(W1_65)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_64) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_254]) ).

tff(c_293,plain,
    ! [W0_70,W1_71] :
      ( aElementOf0('#skF_2'(W0_70,W1_71),xC)
      | ~ aSubsetOf0(W1_71,xB)
      | aSubsetOf0(W1_71,W0_70)
      | ~ aSet0(W1_71)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_70) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_40,c_38,c_262]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [W0_14,W1_20] :
      ( ~ aElementOf0('#skF_2'(W0_14,W1_20),W0_14)
      | aSubsetOf0(W1_20,W0_14)
      | ~ aSet0(W1_20)
      | ~ aSet0(W0_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_297,plain,
    ! [W1_71] :
      ( ~ aSubsetOf0(W1_71,xB)
      | aSubsetOf0(W1_71,xC)
      | ~ aSet0(W1_71)
      | ~ aSet0(xC) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_293,c_28]) ).

tff(c_327,plain,
    ! [W1_74] :
      ( ~ aSubsetOf0(W1_74,xB)
      | aSubsetOf0(W1_74,xC)
      | ~ aSet0(W1_74) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_38,c_297]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(xA,xC),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_118]) ).

tff(c_342,plain,
    ( ~ aSubsetOf0(xA,xB)
    | ~ aSet0(xA) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_327,c_44]) ).

tff(c_361,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_42,c_48,c_342]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM533+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:51:23 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.67/1.96  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.67/1.96  
% 3.67/1.96  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.67/1.99  
% 3.67/1.99  Inference rules
% 3.67/1.99  ----------------------
% 3.67/1.99  #Ref     : 0
% 3.67/1.99  #Sup     : 55
% 3.67/1.99  #Fact    : 0
% 3.67/1.99  #Define  : 0
% 3.67/1.99  #Split   : 3
% 3.67/1.99  #Chain   : 0
% 3.67/1.99  #Close   : 0
% 3.67/1.99  
% 3.67/1.99  Ordering : KBO
% 3.67/1.99  
% 3.67/1.99  Simplification rules
% 3.67/1.99  ----------------------
% 3.67/1.99  #Subsume      : 16
% 3.67/1.99  #Demod        : 46
% 3.67/1.99  #Tautology    : 16
% 3.67/1.99  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.67/1.99  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.67/1.99  
% 3.67/1.99  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.67/1.99  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.67/1.99  
% 3.67/1.99  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.67/1.99  ----------------------
% 3.67/1.99  Preprocessing        : 0.50
% 3.67/2.00  Parsing              : 0.27
% 3.67/2.00  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.67/2.00  Main loop            : 0.36
% 3.67/2.00  Inferencing          : 0.15
% 3.67/2.00  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.67/2.00  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 3.67/2.00  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.67/2.00  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 3.67/2.00  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.67/2.00  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.67/2.00  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.67/2.00  Total                : 0.91
% 3.67/2.00  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.67/2.00  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.67/2.00  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.67/2.00  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------