TSTP Solution File: NUM521+3 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM521+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.24s 2.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 16 unt; 4 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 44 ( 12 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_219,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(xp,X1) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_219) ).
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,sz10) = X1
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_71,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xp),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_71) ).
cnf(i_0_217,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(xp,X1) != xm
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_217) ).
cnf(i_0_212,hypothesis,
( xp = xn
| xp = xm
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn,xp)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xp) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_212) ).
cnf(i_0_35,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2)
| sdtlseqdt0(X2,X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_35) ).
cnf(i_0_73,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xn),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_73) ).
cnf(i_0_208,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(xp,xn),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_208) ).
cnf(i_0_72,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_72) ).
cnf(i_0_210,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(xp,xm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-__lp9e2c/lgb.p',i_0_210) ).
cnf(c_0_231,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(xp,X1) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_219 ).
cnf(c_0_232,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,sz10) = X1
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_233,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_234,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xp),
i_0_71 ).
cnf(c_0_235,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(xp,X1) != xm
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_217 ).
cnf(c_0_236,hypothesis,
( xp = xn
| xp = xm
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn,xp)
| ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xp) ),
i_0_212 ).
cnf(c_0_237,plain,
( sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2)
| sdtlseqdt0(X2,X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2) ),
i_0_35 ).
cnf(c_0_238,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xn),
i_0_73 ).
cnf(c_0_239,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(xp,xn),
i_0_208 ).
cnf(c_0_240,negated_conjecture,
xn != xp,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_231,c_0_232]),c_0_233]),c_0_234])]) ).
cnf(c_0_241,negated_conjecture,
xm != xp,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_235,c_0_232]),c_0_233]),c_0_234])]) ).
cnf(c_0_242,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xp),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_236,c_0_237]),c_0_234]),c_0_238])]),c_0_239]),c_0_240]),c_0_241]) ).
cnf(c_0_243,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
i_0_72 ).
cnf(c_0_244,hypothesis,
~ sdtlseqdt0(xp,xm),
i_0_210 ).
cnf(c_0_245,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_242,c_0_237]),c_0_243]),c_0_234])]),c_0_244]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : NUM521+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 19:49:38 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.24/2.21 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.24/2.21 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.24/2.21 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.24/2.21 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 7.24/2.21 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.24/2.21 #
% 7.24/2.21 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 7.24/2.21 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.24/2.21
% 7.24/2.21 # Proof found!
% 7.24/2.21 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.24/2.21 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.24/2.21 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.24/2.21
% 7.24/2.21 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.24/2.21 # User time : 0.038 s
% 7.24/2.21 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.24/2.21 # Total time : 0.042 s
% 7.24/2.21 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.24/2.21
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------